Posted on 01/02/2025 11:05:33 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Thanks.
I am convinced “The Program” is real, as an example.
Grusch was a great witness.
There are two more “controversial” documents that seal the deal for me:
—The Leonard Stringfield investigations on crash retrievals
—The MJ12 crash retrieval manual
In my view they reinforce each other and establish a solid case—with a stunning level of detail.
BTW, I rented Fox’s “The Program” today. It’s great so far. Nothing that you and I didn’t already know...but it’s good to know the rest of the public will see it and come up to date.
Will check them out.
The manual is a bit hard to find—this link will work:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ZERORAPID/comments/18b5rhd/mj12_special_operations_manual_crash_retrieval/
The Stringfield book is online for free as well:
https://archive.org/details/ufo-crash-retrievals-status-reports-1-vii/mode/2up
This is definitely something that will need a legislative determination to stipulate how the government courts will be directed to approach claims of derivative work. Just as an inventor can use this technology as an assistant, so an aggrieved party can use it to find a way to validate their claim of partial credit for the resulting product. It surely looks like AI will be a fully-employed tort lawyer generator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.