Posted on 10/24/2024 10:20:27 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
Then why hasn’t the others put a stop to those?
BTW. I believe Trump wins. And the one who will lead the way to stop Trump from being certified will be Raskin. Schumer will back it.
Because there are no Joooo! cops. Are there Methodist cops, making sure that the “Spirit” really does move anyone who claims it has? Are there Catholic cops who catch priests diddling altar boys and defrocking them? Or excommunicating Catholic politicians who support abortion? Jews do not have an organized internal enforcement mechanism, any more than your faith does. People do what they do. It’s both obscene and disturbing when they p!ss all over their professed faith in the name of that faith. But there is no way to “put a stop” to it, other than by calling them out. And plenty have called out Soros, Sanders, et al. To no avail.
Here’s a little Groucho, and Jack Benny for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFLT7k_9doA
Oh..OK.
BTW you referenced Jesus. That’s good.
His mother was Jewish, who was the father?
You won’t like my answer, so I won’t give you one. Let’s not get into theology.
I believe I know your answer.
And there is the very root of the contention between Jews, Arabs and Christians.
Believe whatever you want to believe. This is not a forum to discuss that, let alone to force the issue.
My understanding is he kept the woman as his mistress in his home, right under his wife’s nose. The boy wasn’t allowed in the house, and Marx convinced Engels to claim paternity of the boy.
His research and presentation of purely modern subject matter is really good, but whenever he attempts to reach back into philosophical history for grounding, he merely demonstrates his own incurable ignorance about that whole broad field. He believes that the foundational principles of Scholastic Realism (the cornerstone philosophy of organized Christianity throughout most of its history, and the underpinning of TRUE conservative thought) are somehow the source inspiration for leftist ideology and he constructs insufferably stupid ad absurdum straw men to appeal to an audience of (he assumes) the lesser educated. He has erected in his own mind obstacles to prevent his own contrary understanding of the development of the ideologies about which he is concerned.
He's fine on most things happening after the French Revolution, but his philosophical bigotry makes him otherwise unreliable.
You a dick. An arrogant one at that. GFY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.