Posted on 10/03/2024 3:15:26 PM PDT by RandFan
“The Supreme Court already made their ruling on this matter.”
As I understand the ruling from reading here, the Supreme Court decision was not definitive, but merely a statement of the law along the lines I thought it should be.
I have not read it, only statements about it:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
I got that link from:
https://conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/senate-democrats-say-presidential-immunity-ruling-allows-egregious-forms-of-wrongdoing.htm
Would someone please point out the items of illegality to me in this passage?
I find the results hard to believe, but I’ll let you read it yourself:
“He condemned Pence for lacking “courage” because he refused to disrupt the certification by rejecting the official electoral votes for Biden in favor of certifying false slates of electors that would have swung the election in Trump’s favor.”
Au contraire. Pence proceeded to certify false slates of electors - false, because they were based upon vote fraud. An honest count of honest votes would have made clear that Trump won the election. The Democrats fought tooth and nail to keep the courts from hearing the cases. Why? What did they have to hide? Why didn’t they encourage the court challenges in order to be able to say “told you so”?
“I don’t know why Garland would have hired him.”
Because he would do anything to get Trump that his masters ordered?
Votes were still "tabulated" weeks after the election because they were still being printed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.