Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harris and Schumer Target the Supreme Court - Democrats make clear that if they win, they’ll push measures to destroy the judiciary’s independence.
Wall Street Journal ^ | 25 Aug, 2024 | David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman

Posted on 08/26/2024 7:09:12 AM PDT by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: MtnClimber

The Democrats’ Goal: One-party Dictatorship.

Must be stopped.


41 posted on 08/26/2024 8:26:42 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

These are the words of a tyrant.

Where are the law schools? The ACLU and ACLJ (what ever happened to Jay Sekulow)?

We don’t need tax cuts or more child care. We need a Congress and Executive Branch to defecd the Constitution and defend our rights like a junkyard dog!


42 posted on 08/26/2024 8:28:15 AM PDT by Thorium90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges

Canon 1: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and
Independence of the Judiciary
An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society.
A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally
observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be
preserved. The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that
objective.

Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance
of Impropriety in All Activities
A. Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and
should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the
integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
B. Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political,
financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment.
A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance
the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others to
convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the
judge. A judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.
C. Nondiscriminatory Membership. A judge should not hold membership in
any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the basis of
race, sex, religion, or national origin.

more (20 pages total) at:
https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/code_of_conduct_for_united_states_judges_effective_march_12_2019.pdf


43 posted on 08/26/2024 8:29:37 AM PDT by Brian Griffin ("Why didn’t she do it three and a half years ago?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
The November 2024 Election is not Republicans vs. Democrats.

The November 2024 Election is Republicans vs. The Chinese Communist Party.

The US Democrat Party is a proxy for the Chinese Communist Party.

44 posted on 08/26/2024 8:36:37 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Fight! Fight! Fight! God Bless America!--President Donald Trump, Butler, Pennsylvania, July 13, 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

New York law:

“PART 100. Judicial Conduct”

“(5) A judge shall not accept, and shall urge members of the judge’s family residing in the judge’s household not to accept, a gift, bequest, favor or loan from anyone except:

(a) a gift incident to a public testimonial, books, tapes and other resource materials supplied by publishers on a complimentary basis for official use, or an invitation to the judge and the judge’s spouse or guest to attend a bar-related function or an activity devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system or the administration of justice;

(b) a gift, award or benefit incident to the business, profession or other separate activity of a spouse or other family member of a judge residing in the judge’s household, including gifts, awards and benefits for the use of both the spouse or other family member and the judge (as spouse or family member), provided the gift, award or benefit could not reasonably be perceived as intended to influence the judge in the performance of judicial duties;

(c) ordinary social hospitality;

(d) a gift from a relative or friend, for a special occasion such as a wedding, anniversary or birthday, if the gift is fairly commensurate with the occasion and the relationship;

(e) a gift, bequest, favor or loan from a relative or close personal friend whose appearance or interest in a case would in any event require disqualification under section 100.3(E);

(f) a loan from a lending institution in its regular course of business on the same terms generally available to persons who are not judges;

(g) a scholarship or fellowship awarded on the same terms and based on the same criteria applied to other applicants; or

(h) any other gift, bequest, favor or loan, only if: the donor is not a party or other person who has come or is likely to come or whose interests have come or are likely to come before the judge.”

more at:
https://ww2.nycourts.gov/rules/chiefadmin/100.shtml


45 posted on 08/26/2024 8:41:47 AM PDT by Brian Griffin ("Why didn’t she do it three and a half years ago?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Vote for the Voo Doo Hoo Doo and get rid of the SCOTUS. Then the turd roller RATS will own all the courts and “judges”.


46 posted on 08/26/2024 9:58:55 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Remember! A vote for the Voo Doo Hoo Doo and Timmy is a vote for another four years of Kenyan BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The democRATs do not need to get rid of the Supreme Court. They just need to imprison the justices that dare disagree with them.


47 posted on 08/26/2024 10:02:29 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I got a feeling that if the Jamaicaho Indian gets elected the U.S. prisons will be get refilled pretty damn quick with natural born Americans and the U.S. paper residents will be taking over.


48 posted on 08/26/2024 10:09:28 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Remember! A vote for the Voo Doo Hoo Doo and Timmy is a vote for another four years of Kenyan BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

- Elimination of the filibuster...
- Expansion of SCOTUS by 10 members...

Will be interesting when moochelle squats on SCOTUS for the next 30-years...


49 posted on 08/26/2024 10:14:54 AM PDT by SuperLuminal ( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Democrats make clear that if they win, they’ll push measures to destroy the judiciary’s independence.

The whole purpose of the SCOTUS/DOJ is independence.

50 posted on 08/26/2024 10:22:33 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (Propaganda keeps only governments in business, not corporations. —John Nolte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

Mostly yes


51 posted on 08/26/2024 10:42:31 AM PDT by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Treason charges ensue

Feel lucky punks well do ya?.


52 posted on 08/26/2024 12:31:43 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson