Posted on 07/23/2024 4:22:58 AM PDT by libh8er
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Politico is VERY concerned about JD Vance. They should be.
‘He’s pretty much the right pic, I think, for anybody who is the VP.
Remember, he knows how to bicker with an Indian woman.”
Yeah, but... does he ‘win’ those fights with an Indian woman? lol
“Polutico” Nuff said!
Pollutico says he’s no good.
I’m sure Pollutico has our best interests in mind.
We must follow everything Pollutico says.
In other news, the Earth is flat ...
The msm seem to believe the two biggest issues for women are “abortion and women’s rights.”
My biggest issues are my grocery bill, 17 million unvetted criminal invaders and taxes.
I call it vaginal politics.
“Presumably, Trump chose Vance as his VP candidate largely to fire up the MAGA base and boost the Republican ticket in Rust Belt states. But that was a choice made when Biden was still heading the Democratic ticket. Now that he’s not, Vance may well become a liability.”
I totally disagree with this premise.
IMHO....
If Trump had picked a female for VP, that would have been seen by most American women as the atypical gimmick that Democrats always use to ‘get the votes’ of that particular voting block... in this case the womens’ vote.
Most anti-Trump women voters wouldn’t vote for Trump no matter who or what he ran with as his VP. And most pro-Trump women are savvy and smart enough to be somewhat offended by that “Democrat-style tactic”.
Also, especially considering what we’ve been witnessing lately re: female SS agents and the SS director’s complete and total ineptness... picking a female VP would only further that perception of continued FUBAR. Kamala Harris has been a dismal failure as VP for the Democrat Party, and Trump picking a female VP would have doubled down on that perception of continued failure.
Most pro-Trump male voters would also, IMO, be offended by Trump picking a female VP at this point in our nations’ deliberately orchestrated demise... and I think Trump would have lost many male voters, had he chosen a female VP.
The nation is in crisis currently. It really is ‘the’ most crucial election in our nation’s history... and we need a strong leadership duo, for a very refreshing and much needed change. I think Trump and Vance fill that bill perfectly. Right men, right time.
I have my concerns about Vance but not for any of the reasons listed here.
My concerns are mostly that he has the charisma of drywall.
Yes, Trump, who’s already stated before the pick that he expected Harris to be the nominee, made a decision without thinking she would be the nominee… what nonsense.
NO —HE IS RIGHT WHERE HE SHOULD BE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.