Posted on 11/15/2023 11:18:37 AM PST by DallasBiff
You posted it. I responded to your post.
—
Fauci had nothing to do with discovery of HIV.
Later he exploited it in almost the same way he exploited Covid.
I told you you are just fantasizing and don’t know what you’re talking about on multiple levels.
Fauci did push AIDS propaganda indeed. He exploited it for sure. Covid was almost a replay of his AIDS scam.
HIV (then called HTLV III) was discovered by Luc Monagnier in Paris. It was possibly co-discovered by Robert Gallo at the National Cancer Institute.
At the very beginning it was thought to be a cancer virus which is why NCI has the lead in the US. A somewhat related virus was known to cause cancer in chickens. Viruses as a cause of common cancers was a very hot topic in the 1970s that ultimately went nowhere.
Young researchers in Infectious Diseases back then were expected to study the body’s immune response to infection. Most chose to work with neutrophils since they ingest and kill bacteria and fungi. Fauci was working on the T4 lymphocyte, whose function at that time was unknown.
It turned out that HTLV III/HIV was not a cancer virus, but that it destroyed T4 cells - which led to understanding exactly what those T4 cells did, and the world turned to the one guy who had started his career studying that particular cell. A year later Ronald Reagan put him in charge of AIDS research and billions of dollars to be granted to chosen young researchers - and the rest is history.
The kabbal was around long before Mr. Fauci showed up. I wasn’t with him when he was instructed to perpetuate the HIV scheme. As far as I’m aware, I don’t know the names of the other individuals involved. As far as I know, I’m not aware of when the HIV bio weapons project was handed over to him.
You believe one thing, I believe another. Our beliefs are formed on the basis of three kinds of sources:
1. Experience
2. Intuition
3. Instruction
The first two are the most powerful for knowing truth. The third can be accurate as well, but only if the source of instruction is both competent and morally straight.
What we’ve come to know about HIV is based only on instruction. Including for researchers and clinicians. This is key: In this instance, THE SOURCE OF INSTRUCTION IS DISHONEST.
This is the essence of my point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.