Posted on 05/07/2022 2:56:57 PM PDT by Morgana
“Why worry about America?”
Europe has stricter laws when it comes to abortion, more so late term ones. A lot of women come from Europe to America to have late term ie third trimester ones.
That is her gripe, that she and other women will not have that “option” in the future.
Murders are often proud of what they have done, some don’t/won’t admits such openly unlike others who do admit such openly.
... the leaked draft opinion to overturn Roe v. Wade, which would make abortion illegal in 22 US states
—
Amazing how easily the daily Mail lies. Makes one wonder about all their reporting.
typical of the Sun to publish an inane article about a person that almost nobody knows, expressing a total lack of remorse for murdering her baby many years ago
sorry, but the issue is between her and our Creator.
nobody reading the Sun can do anything to help her now.
Meanwhile, why doesn’t the Sun write an article about George SorozNazi’s lack of remorse for working with the Nazis in WW2, or for any of the damage he’s caused the world since?
At least he has the money to make up for some of the harms he has caused
Never heard of her.
It brings to mind Knoll’s law of media accuracy: "Everything you read in the newspapers is absolutely true, except for the rare story of which you happen to have firsthand knowledge."
In other words, when it concerns a matter where we have firsthand knowledge or subject-matter expertise, we can look at a Daily Mail article and deride it as obvious bunk...and yet when it comes to an entirely different matter (such as Russia, Ukraine, Trump, and so forth) where said knowledge is lacking, our trust in the Daily Mail isn't impeded by the fact they got it wrong on another story.
You can substitute the Daily Mail for any other outlet, but the principle is the same: when a media outlet can get something drastically wrong on one subject that we're familiar with, why should they be given the benefit of doubt on other subjects which we lack familiarity with?
Rita Moreno said the same thing for decades after an abortion. The father was Marlon Brando. Sometime ago, she expressed “some” regret. Well, she is getting closer to Eternity, so...
And we care what this unknown person says because....?
Ulrika Jonsson may be publicly claiming that she carries 'no guilt' or 'emotional trauma' to try to convince herself that she is not a murderer. Would she repeat that claim over and over again if it were behind her?
She has to be reminded every day every time she sees one of her children and wonders what great things the baby she killed would have accomplished. Don't you think?
Ulrika is carrying a load of suppressed guilt, I suspect.
Just one more psychotic monster, produced by secularism and wealth, unrestrained by morality.
Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.
Does Cameron know his mom (whoever you are) whacked his brother or sister?
The family photo in the article shows her four surviving children - fathered by four different men. I feel sorry for the children.
Yeah, no, she's OK.
NO human being has any “right” to kill an innocent unborn baby...not one! There is no such ***right!***
Just a common whore, this one. Her opinion carries the weight of a back alley streetwalker, as far as I’m concerned.
Who the hell is Ulrika Johnson and why should we GAFF?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.