Posted on 12/29/2021 9:12:40 PM PST by Enlightened1
“Thorazine might help with that.”
You are dodging... Now you suggest chemical submission. Don’t try to spin this 180. Ironic that so many are claiming the courage and principles of those who gave them their personal freedom and liberty was insanity. They are sellout politically correct cowards parroting the Communist syops propaganda.
If you choose to be an enslaved coward go for it, it is your individual right given to you by those who did stand on courage and principles. But don’t try to ridicule those who have the balls and very same individual right to stand up against the oppressive agenda rather than live on their knees.
Are you saying that Golden Eagle is lying and that you didn't think that Mueller was secretly 'working with Trump' to take down Clinton. like he says?
Set the record straight, now's your chance. But if you do/did believe that, would you agree that that would be a 'conspiracy', and if not proven, a 'theory?. Which of course makes it a 'conspiracy theory'. You can't argue with that logic, amirite?
Go ahead. Call Golden Eagle a liar.
“Along with the two others whose names are on that same early paper.”
Not early papers, the patent.
You must have not read your own link. It substantiates basically what Malone contends.
And as for peers objecting, of course. Scientific peers can be as backstabbing and snakish as anyone’s peers, maybe more so.
And, may I ask, why so much animosity to Malone? Does your s scientific accomplishments match his? Most of the experts not in the vaccine money chain or government employ agree with Malone about the vaccine.
Okay, check your ping list, I'm getting tired of telling you the same thing ten times.
First, understand that the 'MRNA technology' and 'MRNA vaccines' are two different but related things. According to your mom Ransomnote, Malone discovered the MRNA technology and some chick nerd discovered the delivery system to it could be applied to vaccines.
Why is this so hard for you to grasp?
And what's hard for me to grasp, is the relevance of your argument. Whether he invented MRNA or collaborated on it, what relevance does that have to what you're trying to accomplish, which is discredit him and everything he says?
He's obviously an expert on MRNA, even by your own admission. So why you goin' all buck wild about it?
(rhetorical question, I already know)
bagster wrote: “Why is this so hard for you to grasp?
And what’s hard for me to grasp, is the relevance of your argument. Whether he invented MRNA or collaborated on it, what relevance does that have to what you’re trying to accomplish, which is discredit him and everything he says?”
If Malone’s misrepresents himself as being the inventor of mRNA, what else does he misrepresent?
bkmk
Oh, obviously everything that comes out of his mouth. Ha. Are you really trying to discredit the body of his work and statements by quibbling whether he should get full credit for 'inventing' MRNA vaccine technology?
Dude, just watching Breaking Bad teaches us that scientists on the ground floor pf new discoveries often are conflicted as to who actually did what and who thought of what first.
His 'misrepresentation' is your interpretation. You have no idea what really happened in the lab. But he does. Give up this line of attack, it makes you look small and stupid.
#GreyMatters
#WalterWhite
The vaxocrat/$hift working $hot $hills fail to mention (real) Dr Robert Malone’s own website....funny that.
From his site....
IT ALL STARTED WHEN…
This is Jill Malone, Robert’s wife writing is this history. We have been married 42 years and I was intricately involved in science at the time. Furthermore, we have kept all of the records of these events. These include lab books, patent disclosures, patent applications, correspondence, drafts of papers, data, etc. of that period. This history is based on my own recollections, as well as Robert’s and it verified by the written documentation, which can be viewed on the links below.
Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines). He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.
It all started when he was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).
This resulted in his seminal paper: Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection RW Malone, PL Felgner, IM Verma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 86 (16), 6077-6081
His filed patent and disclosures from the Salk included in-vivo RNA transfection, mRNA as a drug, mRNA production, transient gene therapy and also methods for mRNA stabilization. These are available for review and can be found in the link below this statement.
When he left the Salk Institute, he moved his research over to Vical in 1988. He brought over mRNA, constructs, reagents that were developed at the Salk institute by Dr. Malone. The first in-vivo mammalian rat experiments were designed by Dr. Malone in January, 1989: this included dosing amounts for the in-vivo experiments. As he had brought his constructs, plasmids, reagents from the Salk Institute, he was easily able to ramp up his research program at Vical - where he was the only employee actually working on this technology at the time. The first in-vivo mouse experiments were performed in February, 1989 when mRNA and DNA was sent to Dr. Jon Wolff via Fedex. Dr.Wolff and his technicians at the University of Wisconsin injected mice and rats. The initial patent disclosures for RNA and DNA vaccination were written by Dr. Malone in 1988-1989. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989. He wrote the patent disclosures (again found in the the link below) and helped design the initial experiments, which were carried out by Dr. Gary Rhodes - in consultation with Dr. Malone. ...
(MUCH more, at link.)
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/rna-vaccine-inventor
Even left leaning Wiki has a tough time dancing around his expertise....
...In the 1980s, while a researcher at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Malone conducted studies on messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology, discovering that it was possible to transfer mRNA protected by a liposome into cultured cells to signal the information needed for the production of proteins.[6][2]
In 1987, Malone performed a landmark experiment on transfection of RNA into human, rat, mouse, Xenopus, and Drosophila cells.[7][8]
In the early 1990s, he collaborated with Jon A. Wolff, Dennis A. Carson, and others on a study that first suggested the possibility of synthesizing mRNA in a laboratory to trigger the production of a desired protein.[9] Malone claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines, although credit for the distinction is more often given to later advance...
(note.....the *although* *more often* part 😂 See? Even Wiki cannot deny.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Malone
bagster wrote: “His ‘misrepresentation’ is your interpretation. You have no idea what really happened in the lab. But he does. Give up this line of attack, it makes you look small and stupid.”
I’m not interpreting anything. I am relying upon his on admission. But, even after he has admitted he didn’t invent mRNA, you, among others, continue to claim that he did. Why not give up that claim since it does make you look small and stupid.
Ha. Stealing my lines will not make you Bagster the Magnificent.
Go reread all the material that has been set upon your table, especially Jane Long's recent contribution. Your inability to learn is disconcerting and doesn't make you LOOK small and stupit. It makes you COMPLETELY small and stupit. And that is no way to go through life.
Unless you're Robert Reisch.
#MemberHim
I get it.... Attack the messenger when you cannot dispute the facts in the video.
Do you have anything intelligent to say?
This is Jill Malone, Robert’s wife writing is this history. We have been married 42 years and I was intricately involved in science at the time. Furthermore, we have kept all of the records of these events. These include lab books, patent disclosures, patent applications, correspondence, drafts of papers, data, etc. of that period. This history is based on my own recollections, as well as Robert’s and it verified by the written documentation, which can be viewed on the links below.
Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines). He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.
It all started when he was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).
This resulted in his seminal paper: Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection RW Malone, PL Felgner, IM Verma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 86 (16), 6077-6081
His filed patent and disclosures from the Salk included in-vivo RNA transfection, mRNA as a drug, mRNA production, transient gene therapy and also methods for mRNA stabilization. These are available for review and can be found in the link below this statement.
When he left the Salk Institute, he moved his research over to Vical in 1988. He brought over mRNA, constructs, reagents that were developed at the Salk institute by Dr. Malone. The first in-vivo mammalian rat experiments were designed by Dr. Malone in January, 1989: this included dosing amounts for the in-vivo experiments. As he had brought his constructs, plasmids, reagents from the Salk Institute, he was easily able to ramp up his research program at Vical - where he was the only employee actually working on this technology at the time. The first in-vivo mouse experiments were performed in February, 1989 when mRNA and DNA was sent to Dr. Jon Wolff via Fedex. Dr.Wolff and his technicians at the University of Wisconsin injected mice and rats. The initial patent disclosures for RNA and DNA vaccination were written by Dr. Malone in 1988-1989. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989. He wrote the patent disclosures (again found in the the link below) and helped design the initial experiments, which were carried out by Dr. Gary Rhodes - in consultation with Dr. Malone.
THE INITIAL mRNA VACCINE EXPERIMENT EVER PERFORMED WAS FIRST CARRIED OUT IN 1989 AND IS WRITTEN UP IN THE ORIGINAL PATENTS. THERE ARE IMAGES OF THESE EXPERIMENTS FROM THE PATENTS FOUND AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
This body of work resulted in nine patents and numerous publications, yielding about 7000 citations for this work. The paper was the first showing data for DNA and RNA side by side for in-vivo (the first paper for in-vivo DNA):
Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Wolff JA, Malone RW, et al. Science. 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8. Cited in 4,750 articles, is the result of that work.
In 1989, research was performed that gave rise to the groundbreaking patents on mRNA vaccination, all with a priority date of March 21, 1989. This is the same priority date as the Salk Patent application, showing that the two institutions were working together. These patents are the first published research on mRNA vaccination. The titles and links to the patents are listed in the documents below. These patents have proof of principle experiments on mRNA vaccines - that clearly document that the invention worked and that these are the first experiments showing this.
Vical told Robert that they would license the Salk Technology (see Vical meeting minutes in the linked document page). Instead, they hired Robert’s thesis advisor from the Salk and soon after, the Salk dropped the patent and Vical never pursued a license from the Salk. Due to an employee contract with Vical, this stopped Robert from working in the field commercially for a decade. Vical claimed all the Salk research happened at Vical and sent a cease and desist letter.
Dr. Malone carried on his research into mRNA and DNA vaccination during the 1990s, culminating in a mucosal patent that was issued in 2000 and had a priority date of 1996. He also helped revolutionize the field of cationic liposomes for the use in RNA and DNA vaccinations. This work was so far ahead of its time, that only now is the world turning to mucosal mRNA vaccination as a method of immunization. For a listing of some of his work, see the publications on the links at the end of this page.
Scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories, Dr. Malone received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University Medical School (Clinical Research Post Graduate) , and in Pathology at UC Davis, He has almost 100 peer-reviewed publications, and has been an invited speaker at about 50 conferences.
For the full backstory on the discovery of mRNA vaccination, as written by Dr. Malone’s partner and wife, please download the PDF located in the section below:
For the full backstory on the discovery of mRNA vaccination, as written by Dr. Malone’s partner and wife, please download the PDF below:
mRNA Vaccine and RNA Transfection/Delivery Papers and Patents directly derived from Robert W Malone’s research
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/general-4
This is Jill Malone, Robert’s wife writing is this history. We have been married 42 years and I was intricately involved in science at the time. Furthermore, we have kept all of the records of these events. These include lab books, patent disclosures, patent applications, correspondence, drafts of papers, data, etc. of that period. This history is based on my own recollections, as well as Robert’s and it verified by the written documentation, which can be viewed on the links below.
Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines). He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.
It all started when he was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).
This resulted in his seminal paper: Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection RW Malone, PL Felgner, IM Verma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 86 (16), 6077-6081
His filed patent and disclosures from the Salk included in-vivo RNA transfection, mRNA as a drug, mRNA production, transient gene therapy and also methods for mRNA stabilization. These are available for review and can be found in the link below this statement.
When he left the Salk Institute, he moved his research over to Vical in 1988. He brought over mRNA, constructs, reagents that were developed at the Salk institute by Dr. Malone. The first in-vivo mammalian rat experiments were designed by Dr. Malone in January, 1989: this included dosing amounts for the in-vivo experiments. As he had brought his constructs, plasmids, reagents from the Salk Institute, he was easily able to ramp up his research program at Vical - where he was the only employee actually working on this technology at the time. The first in-vivo mouse experiments were performed in February, 1989 when mRNA and DNA was sent to Dr. Jon Wolff via Fedex. Dr.Wolff and his technicians at the University of Wisconsin injected mice and rats. The initial patent disclosures for RNA and DNA vaccination were written by Dr. Malone in 1988-1989. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989. He wrote the patent disclosures (again found in the the link below) and helped design the initial experiments, which were carried out by Dr. Gary Rhodes - in consultation with Dr. Malone.
THE INITIAL mRNA VACCINE EXPERIMENT EVER PERFORMED WAS FIRST CARRIED OUT IN 1989 AND IS WRITTEN UP IN THE ORIGINAL PATENTS. THERE ARE IMAGES OF THESE EXPERIMENTS FROM THE PATENTS FOUND AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
This body of work resulted in nine patents and numerous publications, yielding about 7000 citations for this work. The paper was the first showing data for DNA and RNA side by side for in-vivo (the first paper for in-vivo DNA):
Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Wolff JA, Malone RW, et al. Science. 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8. Cited in 4,750 articles, is the result of that work.
In 1989, research was performed that gave rise to the groundbreaking patents on mRNA vaccination, all with a priority date of March 21, 1989. This is the same priority date as the Salk Patent application, showing that the two institutions were working together. These patents are the first published research on mRNA vaccination. The titles and links to the patents are listed in the documents below. These patents have proof of principle experiments on mRNA vaccines - that clearly document that the invention worked and that these are the first experiments showing this.
Vical told Robert that they would license the Salk Technology (see Vical meeting minutes in the linked document page). Instead, they hired Robert’s thesis advisor from the Salk and soon after, the Salk dropped the patent and Vical never pursued a license from the Salk. Due to an employee contract with Vical, this stopped Robert from working in the field commercially for a decade. Vical claimed all the Salk research happened at Vical and sent a cease and desist letter.
Dr. Malone carried on his research into mRNA and DNA vaccination during the 1990s, culminating in a mucosal patent that was issued in 2000 and had a priority date of 1996. He also helped revolutionize the field of cationic liposomes for the use in RNA and DNA vaccinations. This work was so far ahead of its time, that only now is the world turning to mucosal mRNA vaccination as a method of immunization. For a listing of some of his work, see the publications on the links at the end of this page.
Scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories, Dr. Malone received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University Medical School (Clinical Research Post Graduate) , and in Pathology at UC Davis, He has almost 100 peer-reviewed publications, and has been an invited speaker at about 50 conferences.
For the full backstory on the discovery of mRNA vaccination, as written by Dr. Malone’s partner and wife, please download the PDF located in the section below:
For the full backstory on the discovery of mRNA vaccination, as written by Dr. Malone’s partner and wife, please download the PDF below:
mRNA Vaccine and RNA Transfection/Delivery Papers and Patents directly derived from Robert W Malone’s research
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/general-4
That’s 100% false. Not sure who brainwashed with that?
See post #54
Thank you, re details of Robert Malone research.
bttt
Enlightened1 wrote: “That’s 100% false. Not sure who brainwashed with that?’
It isn’t brainwashing when Malone admits that he didn’t invent mRNA.
You see, even Malone denies he invented mRNA yet some like yourself and ransomnote continue in this misinformation.
bagster wrote: “Go reread all the material that has been set upon your table, especially Jane Long’s recent contribution. Your inability to learn is disconcerting and doesn’t make you LOOK small and stupit. It makes you COMPLETELY small and stupit. And that is no way to go through life.”
I’ve read all that in one form or another. I do not believe in conspiracy theories. In order to believe the things you do, one has to believe in a very large conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands with the objective of killing millions of people. First, I have more belief in the goodness of people to believe that many people would want to kill millions. Second, I very much doubt that such a large undertaking would be successful. Thousands would blow the whistle. Third, everyone involved in that conspiracy would be subject to criminal prosecution. They might have immunity from civil proceedings but they are still subject to criminal law. Fourth, no one has been able to advance a plausible explanation of a business model that works by killing their customers. Fifth, I’m just not mentally disposed to conspiracy theories. It takes a peculiar type to believe in them.
You assume all 'conspiracy theories' are equal.
#BadAssumption
#SloppyThinking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.