Posted on 10/22/2021 2:38:21 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
Human blood has formaldehyde, acetone, ethanol, dihydrogen, tryptophan, and about a dozen other elements that, if present in sufficient levels, will kill you. If you want to protect yourself from every trace element like that then by all means drain your body of blood and you'll be safe, right?
There seems to be two types of people refusing to believe the dangers of these experimental shots.
First are those who have a strong normalcy bias - they have hard time accepting that there are people in the world who would promote something that is at best ineffective, and at worse, dangerous. It is hard to open people’s eyes because those ideas at one time seemed to be in the conspiracy theory realm. What the end game is, I don’t know - depopulation, eugenics, control, destruction of business and healthcare, all of the above...
I used to be more of a skeptic myself, but I cannot deny what is happening. The more I see ideas being censored and ridiculed, once-highly respected and credentialed doctors and scientists being threatened, legitimate, effective treatments being denied, the more I believe that evil is afoot. Anyone who questions the status quo is ridiculed, silenced, shamed and their livelihoods threatened. The gaslighting is in our face.
These days, I am choosing to keep an open mind. I believe we should be considering all possibilities. The threat is real and there is too much at stake. There are very bad players behind all of this and I put nothing past them. Nothing.
The second group are part of those working to shut down free discussion on the shot, interestingly, also do the same with election fraud and other situations we are facing which threaten our freedoms.
I don’t know what their end game is or who they work for, but they do not come here with studies and data. They do not try to debate the substance of the articles, only ridicule the authors and posters. They descend on every thread exposing the potential dangers of the shot, and cheer each other on.
They refuse to look at any evidence you put in front of them. If you show them a study, they tell you it’s not peer reviewed, you show them peer reviewed research they tell you it’s not a randomized control trial. You show them a RCT, and they tell you it’s not double blind, you post double blind studies and they still find some reason to play it off as conspiracy or they ridicule you. If you show them concrete evidence where they are wrong, they ignore you. They expect to be followed for their expertise and despite their own anonymity, they have no issue questioning the credentials of others.
If they think something is too far out there, they could just scroll past like others do. When I see them descend on a thread en masse, with the same narrative, I tend to think that there is something in the data that they don’t want us looking at. That makes me pay closer attention to things I might otherwise file away as an interesting idea.
There are two things every conservative should asking right now - is the shot safe, and is it effective. We are seeing more and more evidence it is neither - some of the evidence is easier to defend than others, but nothing should be off the table for discussion. The stakes are too high.
I have never taken any vaccines as an adult.
My reasoning is very simple—there must be overwhelming, conclusive and incontrovertible evidence that any vaccine is highly effective (that means _immunity_) with virtually zero possible side effects.
I refused to take the flu shots because they seemed to “miss” very often on the latest version of the flu—they flunked the “effective” criteria.
The current vaxxes score an F- on both effectiveness and side effects.
Must be something there!
Just add something to this. Person that I know has had her doctor suspended until the vaccine deadline is passed. Why? Because that doctor was issuing, according to the authorities, too medical exemptions for the vaccine.
That is the first I have heard of that happening, I’m not surprised, but I am disgusted by it all.
Look at these doctors who are speaking out about the vaccine, or using therapeutics, or signing exemptions like your friend’s doctor. They stand to gain nothing. In fact, they stand to lose everything by speaking out. Same with the whistleblowers, and nurses coming forward. There is nothing in it for them.
But the ones shutting them down? They stand to gain A LOT - control, power, money...
The fact they are ignoring natural immunity or pushing the shots on kids should tell us all we need to know. Those are two areas that the data is incontrovertible.
would one shard of glass in your blood stream make a difference or would it depend on how many shards you have trying to flow through it?
obviously any bad material is bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.