Posted on 08/15/2021 12:38:52 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
Your sarcasm is noted and this is my sarcastic reply. :)
If you haven’t seen mRNA inventor Robert Malone on War Room or you don’t know what antibody-dependent enhancement is, this is a good video.
Naughty Nurse?
Has anyone ever seen the two of them in the same room?
Well?
The second half is more useful info not covered before.
when sloppy joe opened the border, invited, welcomed, and started to spread hundreds of thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a so called “global pandemic” proved we were being lied to about the severity of this so called “deadly virus”...
Anyone with a few brain cells knows this entire thing is being used as a political tool. Real medicine is not allowed to upset this big pharma apple cart.
She stressed that employers or governments mandating these covid vaccines, which are still legally experimental with unknown long-term effects, should be illegal under the Nuremberg Code. I suggest saving this to hard drive and/or printing it out in case you need it to deal with an employer or a lawsuit:
The Nuremberg Code (1947) Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996; 313(7070):1445-75.The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
“should be illegal under the Nuremberg Code”
The Nuremberg code is not a law in any legal jurisdiction on the planet.
It was codified for a specific event and then used never again.
It depends. I’ve been here since November of 1997 (changed my account in 2011. I’ve actually seen what appear to be crazy leftist posts from people who have been here almost 20 years. But if they’ve been here that long, they are probably just still thinking through the particular issue.
If someone’s been here a decade and still getting crap for their posts, that proves solid staying power, if nothing else. :)
*
Our doctor put my family on Ivermectin when my son tested positive. And my wife had been on HCQ for years. We were already taking high doses of zinc & Vitamin D.
2 of us, including my wife, ended up hospitalized with COVID pneumonia. 2 of us had asymptomatic COVID.
Not good news 😬
Thank you.
I suppose the word should be "unethical," or "violations that were cited in the war crimes trials against Nazis." That's a little wordy, that.
More immediate in America, however, is the simple truth that the Constitution, which is the ONLY legal source of power delegated by the states and the people to the feds, enumerates to the federal government NO AUTHORITY to meddle in healthcare AT ALL.
Notwithstanding all the other legal and ethical arguments when it comes to the federal government, THE CONSTITUTION is the greatest argument and bulwark of freedom against the tyranny of the feds.
PATRIOTS, GET BACK TO DEMANDING AND FORCING FEDERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION!!!!
Well yeah, but there is also laws that political parties shouldn’t cheat on elections, so a lot of good that does us.
So far as an employee of Texas A&M Health Science Center we are not even mandated to wear masks, although there are strict guidelines on PPE in certain lab areas. I am attending a college reunion this November and if I have to have a vaccination passport to fly I’ll just drive from Texas to Charleston SC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.