Amazing how that works.
.
Posted on 07/23/2021 1:38:19 AM PDT by wannabegeek
Well spotted! Thanks!
“Of course you’ll not die from COVID-19 because it’s only coronavirus that can only cause common cold...”
Really? This is not helpful and makes healthy skepticism appear dumb.
You really believe the ChiComs manufactured their Wuhan bioweapon so it’s capability is limited to “cause common cold?”
You think President Trump or Ted Nugent among millions were almost felled by a “common cold.”
If I sign up do I get a ChiCom check from their Ministry of Propaganda?
🙄
797 ng = 99% of the vaccine?
Must be the new math.
For anyone interested in learning about mRNA vaccines, here is an excellent 1.5 hr video by Dr. Robert Malone who discovered them in 1988 while a PhD student at Salk Institute.
The video is factual, scientific, objective, and just done last month.
This same guy was on Bannon’s War Room last evening at 5 pm.
I shouldn't have to google. I'd expect the original article author to present it in a link. Not the freeper, but the author.
Yup.
Amazing how that works.
.
Not sure I view this as Newspeak. Technical definitions change all the time in my field. What was not considered Artificial Intelligence 10 years ago, is considered AI now, for example. Machine-learning, as a solid example.
So I don’t mind the changing of the definition of ‘vaccine’; however, I do share a healthy skepticism over mRNA theraputics. It has equal ability to do harm, as good.
mRNA technology might someday cure cancer. OTOH, mRNA technology might someday be the next vector for mass murder.
Visual evidence can be quantitative if passed through an image analysis s/w program.
That has been validated and reproduced by other researchers. Validation means analyzing samples with measured amounts of the target material. All validation study samples should be provided to the instrumentation people in a blinded manner. etc
Without published procedures and outcomes any analytical method is suspect.
Correct, there was another article done about 2 weeks ago, that graphene oxide was in their vaccine, but can’t remember where it was published.
Well, they are keeping track of lot numbers.
And they seem to modify the ‘vax’ quickly for the ‘new’ variants.
This sure sounds like away to introduce variations and track them, like an approach to a good experiment.
Same here. I don’t trust anything I read without verification and even then I tend to still have doubts.
Whatever gain of function research done, 99% of the people are asympthomatic, 1% sympthomatic. The useful idiot chicom's just had to create phony video showing the world their people forcefully hauled into decontamination vans, some pretended to be collapsing, etc., that media kept airing to scaremongering. Again I saw this COVID thing all hoax from the gitgo perpetuated by the media, democrats and some rinos. I'm not sure about the Spaniard's scientists whatever they found. But the COVID injection may already killed 3 millions in U.S., over a million in UK by looking at flourishing funeral-mortuary business websites around the world to seeing a UK funeral director said funerals skyrocketed since January 6, 2021.
Lengthy critique of the claims made by the team at the University of Almeria in Spain.
WHITNEY WEBB INTERVIEW – IS THERE GRAPHENE OXIDE IN THE COVID-19 INJECTIONS?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1qriHkeJsDH7/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.