And I won't be taking any advice or lecture seriously from any internet tranny.
#TrannySplaining
Posted on 04/12/2021 3:32:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
| Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives | ||
03/22/2021 10:13:02 AM PDT · by ransomnote · 15 replies lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon I never expected to be writing something like this. I am an ordinary person, recently semi-retired from a career in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech, where I spent over 30 years trying to solve problems of disease understanding and seek new treatments for allergic and inflammatory disorders of lung and skin. I’ve always been interested in problem solving, so when anything biological comes along, my attention is drawn to it. Come 2020, came SARS-CoV-2. I’ve written about.. | ||
You represented FDA approved medications. I do not know what you mean, but it bears pointing out that HCQ and Ivermectin are more experimental than vaccines in CoVID as they are not presented through phase 1 -3 trials.
Honest was a misnomer. I generally believe you are pretty honest. I wanted to clarify.
A link from the excerpted article in my last comment goes to this.
Hidden cameras capture misinformation, fundraising tactics used by anti-vaxx movement
https://archive.is/y6OY1
And the OP for this thread is about a complete quack. If this were accurate, dont you think that there would be an awful lot of deaths in the Phase 1 2 and 3 groups who were vaccinated since SPRING 2020?
Just asking.
And I won't be taking any advice or lecture seriously from any internet tranny.
#TrannySplaining
You represented FDA approved medications. I do not know what you mean, but it bears pointing out that HCQ and Ivermectin are more experimental than vaccines in CoVID as they are not presented through phase 1 -3 trials.
Honest was a misnomer. I generally believe you are pretty honest. I wanted to clarify.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Both Ivermectin and HCQ completed FDA approval decades ago.
HCQ has been used for approx 60 years for those suffering from LUPUS and no one was concerned about it until foreign countries reported it works in the treatment of Covid-19.
Ivermectin was initially used for animals, but has been prescribed for many years for human use, scabies etc. (oral)
mRNA never was approved for use by the FDA on humans because it never made it past EUA.
You are muddying the waters to distort the records.
Thank you for your response and link. Apropos I did not pull that statement of of thin air, I have seen a number of posts to that effect (and sorry, I cannot provide) Whether they or Dr. Tenpenny were referring to more complete/useful or scientifically definitive data, or in what timeframe, I do not know.She does appear to be appropriately credentialed.
IMHO to premptively dismiss any counter claims to the inaccuracies, distortions sometimes outright deceptions and the edicts/dictaks put forward by HerrDoktor FauxiGates, that Imperial College London wackjob, the throughly politicized CDC,WHO, pharma, and the ChineseCommunistParty is somewhat akin to our Left/Dem/MSM, social media screaming that any mention or attempt to examine the stolen election is conspiracy and sedition by domestic terrorists.
And the OP for this thread is about a complete quack. If this were accurate, dont you think that there would be an awful lot of deaths in the Phase 1 2 and 3 groups who were vaccinated since SPRING 2020?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There were 45 people in March - May trial. After the Phase I was complete, the companies have not reported on the health of their trial participants, and I believe they will like if forced to do so. We have no way of knowing, but you know that.
Given the faulty experimental design of Phase III, I doubt a full trial was conducted and believe it’s likely they actually used a smaller number of people and pocketed the cash. Phase III Pfizer is not complete yet - I doubt Moderna’s is really complete either - they are changing what constitutes a ‘phase’ in order to hide the data.
They know what they are doing. What they are doing is intentionally evil. They will not report themselves.
There is no question that these meds are prescribed for autoimmune disease and anthelminthics. HOWEVER, do you deny it is accurate to say that HCQ and Ivermectin for CoVID is being used OFF label which means without FDA approval for CoVID?
You really do crack me up.
Yep, like most things money is a big motivator. Leads to “seminars”, websites crammed with $$ making ads, monetized videos on YouTube, etc, etc..
Next thing you know some of your detractors and some of mine will accuse us of a bromance that crosses ideological lines.
see 210
You represented FDA approved medications. I do not know what you mean, but it bears pointing out that HCQ and Ivermectin are more experimental than vaccines in CoVID as they are not presented through phase 1 -3 trials.
~~~
Ivermectin and HCQ are not experimental in terms of tolerability compared with Covid vaccines.
Decades of using Ivermectin/HCQ on label and off have demonstrated safety.
mRNA is based on failed technology that was never deemed safe enough to warrant FDA approval. So they shoved it on the public under an EUA.
Screaming it like a fat kid demanding cake does not make it so, lab rabbit.
Sir, I appreciate your reasoned arguments. I understand your statements, but I disagree with your analysis. The beauty is that you have the right to your opinion and I will vigorously defend your right to not vaccinate.
If. for some reason you would get sick, I implore you, skip the ivermectin dont bother with HCQ. Please get the monoclonal infusions (bamlanivimab or Regeneron). These are actual cures for the disease.
Thank you for all your debate and points. They are appreciated and I respect your opinion, just so you know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.