Grenell bait-and-switch reveals the danger of ‘LGBT conservative’ outreach

LifeSiteNews ^ | March 5th 2021 | Calvin Freiburger

[Kevmo]

Perhaps it is worthwhile to state what the bible says to do about homosexuality and perversion. Pillars of salt come to my mind.

[Kevmo]

I don’t like it. The bible says that God made them, man and woman and that marriage is to be between a man and a woman.

If the guvmint wants to redefine marriage then just drop the subject altogether. Don’t make marital status a thing at all, never ask about it, don’t attach any benefits to it whatsoever. No tax exemptions or tax penalties. Completely irrelevant and none of the guvmint’s bizness.

[Kevmo]

+1

[BobL]

“I tried to make sense of your posts but couldn’t.”

It’s Friday night. Understand, and no problem!

[Kevmo]

"Big Tent" Republicanism From my home page: ___________________________________________________________


I’m a big tent republican.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1821435/posts?page=18455
Here’s an analogy to work with. Take a small box and fill it with some rocks. Then add some rice, filling it to the top. Now take all the same stuff, but in a different order. Put in the rice first, then add the rocks. What you’ll find is that if you put in the big stuff first, the small stuff will fit around it. But if you put in the small stuff first, the big stuff won’t have room. The republican tent is the box. The Big issues are the socon issues, to be put in first. The little issues are things that can be accommodated around the bigger stuff. A candidate who tries to focus on the smaller issues first and leave out the bigger issues has no way of getting all of us into the tent. He splits the party. The candidate who gets the big stuff right and as much of the little stuff that will fit, he can fit more into the tent. We’re often amazed at how much rice can keep fitting in. Folks such as Rudy or Romney flunk some of the big issues, and on some of the little issues it looks to me like anyone else’s rice would do just as well. All that remains for us to agree on is which are the bedrock principles and which are not. Why would there be so much invective aimed at rudy or romney from the right? Because there are some bedrock principles that he is leaving out. Bad move. I see rudybot and romneybot postings all the time saying that they would vote for Hunter or Palin, and I see socon postings that say they would not vote for rudy or romney. That’s a BIG indicator of a few bedrock principles that are being left outside the tent in order to let in some rice.

___________________________________________________________________

[Kevmo]

“if ever there was a hill to die on”

Yes, this is a good hill. Belle Monte, Belmont.

[Kevmo]

Where they support the MAGA2ude, I accept them. Where they go empty suit or own—agenda, I drop them.

[Kevmo]

If conversion therapy is so ineffective then why are they so afraid of it? It would be like trying to outlaw the idiotic Chemtrail Conspiracists.

[Bikkuri]

Same story, different acre (by a few 100 feet, anyway)

[Kevmo]

Good point

[Kevmo]

The issue is that he is no longer staying behind closed doors with his perversion agenda.

[Kevmo]

+1

[Kevmo]

So what?

Just sayin’...

[Kevmo]

+1

It is simply a perversion.

[rollo tomasi]

Give me a break, special pleading clap-trap that leads to more social ills. Began with no-fault divorce in the 1953 (Oklahoma began moving away from at fault) and carries on today.

There is no keeping same-sex fetishes in the bedroom when .... "My name is John this is my husband/partner" or "My name is Jane, this is my wife/partner..."

Keeping it the bedroom means no one would know who has same sex fetishes or not. Your argument is convoluted to the core and your attitude gave rise to the tranny movement which forced their way and shoved their fetish down society's throats just like the homosexuals you defend.

[BobL]

The people here would have a NERVOUS BREAKDOWN if they see what we were saying about Mr. Levine. They hate him on this thread...whereas people on this other thread are supporting these types of Drag Queens:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3939882/posts

[BobL]

...sorry, got the threads backwards. The linked thread is attacking a Drag Queen...oh, the horrors! Hopefully the people here won’t find it.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3939882/posts

[Kevmo]

I’m lost on the point you were trying to make.

[BobL]

“I’m lost on the point you were trying to make.”

Don’t blame you. On this thread they’re defending a guy who is shoving trannies in our face, on the linked thread they’re attacking a tranny.

[rollo tomasi]

Fag hags/homosexual libertarians or libertarians who support same sex fetishes/parents who support their child’s sexual fetish are on threads and defending perversion in the face of other threads that flat out condemn the behavior, especially if its a democrat.

Bob is saying same sex fetishes by republicans good—— same sex-fetishes by democrats bad.