Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

QAnon are pinning their last desperate hopes on Trump emerging as president on March 4
Yahoo! ^ | Feb 27 | Joshua Zitser

Posted on 02/28/2021 5:16:20 AM PST by RandFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 last
To: Stravinsky

And also the numbers fell from “thousands of secret indictments” to, now, just Biteme.


181 posted on 03/01/2021 11:08:40 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: LS
said, "the numbers fell from “thousands of secret indictments” to, now, just Biteme"

It would "seem" that way. I have faith our military will do the right thing and end this take over

182 posted on 03/01/2021 12:34:29 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

The military will do no such thing.

Haven’t you been paying attention to what is going on with the purges & the wke-ness there?


183 posted on 03/01/2021 12:55:56 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: LS
said, "Haven’t you been paying attention to what is going on with the purges & the wke-ness there?"
Yes. The question you should be asking is why?
I'm still to this day of the opinion Trump will be president or elected president THIS YEAR.
184 posted on 03/01/2021 1:16:24 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

The Commander in Chief Clause of Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.” Biden is President, ergo he is CIC.

The military would recognize DOJ taking its sweet time investigating a matter concerning the president’s son as requested by two senators as a “compromised DOJ”? Hello? It’s none of the military’s business. They do not sit in judgment over our various organs of government, nor do they stage coups and remove sitting presidents whenever some executive department is pokey or whatever. This is is the USA, not a military dictatorship like Burma or Sudan, thank God.

Your link: it is not the official White House website, but let’s assume it is accurate. From the page you linked:

**The 2007 “National Security Presidential Directive 51” directs the geographic dispersion of leadership, staff, and infrastructure in order to maintain the functions of the United States Government in the event the nation’s capital is “decapitated” by a terrorist attack.**

Seeing as how DC has not been decapitated by a terrorist attack, what does Directive 51 have to do with any of this?


185 posted on 03/01/2021 3:46:03 PM PST by CatHerd (Not a newbie - lost my password)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd
said, "“compromised DOJ”? Hello? It’s none of the military’s business"

What do you think the US military's primary job is?

186 posted on 03/01/2021 5:13:25 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

“To support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of superior officers, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.”

Nothing there about poking their noses into the civilian branches of government. And Biden is the President of the United States.

Do you think our military should have forcibly removed Trump from office when DOJ was poking along investigating his alleged Russia-Russia-Russia ties? I would hope not.

But you think they should remove Biden because DOJ is poking along in its investigation of Biden’s son? Should some unelected general sit in judgment over whether a sitting president should be removed from office? Is that Constitutional? Or is it like something you’d read about happening in some banana republic of yesteryear? Even the banana republics haven’t been up to such shenanigans lately, st least in our hemisphere.


187 posted on 03/01/2021 7:38:14 PM PST by CatHerd (Not a newbie - lost my password)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd
said, "all enemies, foreign and domestic"

Compromised meaning that agency is compromised by foreign influence.
The military has gone through dozens of scenario's with a Manchurian candidate. Donald Trump was falsely accused of being a Manchurian candidate and our process found he was not.

If there is no way to correct the problem. With other agencies are corrupted by foreign adversaries then it's the Military duty to act. The process takes time for all avenues to self correct without intervention. The military can not and will not act until all none military avenues are exhausted.

"Should some unelected general sit in judgment over whether a sitting president should be removed from office? Is that Constitutional?"
Yes with other agencies in agreement which DNI, DHS and Treasury department have already agreed we have major foreign control over our system. At this point is it's only a matter what action they well use. But they're REQUIRED to act. When is unknown.

Is it constitutional? You just read it to me.

188 posted on 03/01/2021 9:46:12 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
The author.


189 posted on 03/01/2021 9:52:52 PM PST by McGruff (Trump/DeSantis 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Much hay is being made of the fact that the Constitution requires the president to address the nation during January of February (State of the Union)

The Constitution does not specify when the State of the Union address is to be given.

190 posted on 03/02/2021 11:08:08 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Given the military has until April 30 or 100 days after integration (from John Roberts statement in 2017 on Trumps complacence can be tried until then.)

Where and when did John Roberts say this? And what is "complacence"?

191 posted on 03/02/2021 11:45:30 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This is MSM manufactured BS.

This is what actual Anons where “Q” posts are saying about it:

ANONS
I have a feeling that this MSM-manufactured idea that “we” believe that
Trump will be inaugurated on Thursday is gaslighting. They are laying the
groundwork for a falseflag, which they will blame on us and say we did it
because we were mad that March 4 didn’t habben.

Keep your heads on a swivel, and denounce this ******* ******** notion
that Trump is getting inaugurated this week.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just for a touch of perspective...

~Easy


192 posted on 03/02/2021 1:25:30 PM PST by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

😀 Probably fueled by the clean up committee dismantling the Clampets four story media platform and all those trailer park looking boxes and trucks, gone at last, from around the White House and the Capitol building, too.

The NG are scheduled to move out on the 12th, I think. MG Walker said that at the Senate hearing today, if I recall.


193 posted on 03/03/2021 1:25:30 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Publik Skules/Academia -> The Farm team, for more Marxists coming. Infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

A glimmer of sanity?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alabama-senate-bans-hormone-therapy-surgery-felony-transgender-youth/

~Easy


194 posted on 03/03/2021 2:07:04 PM PST by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson