Posted on 02/07/2021 7:41:19 PM PST by ransomnote
It seems to me you and a couple of others are using this "no outside comms" phrase as a hammer to imply that Juan O'Savin (JOS) is a black hat and therefore you've nailed him as someone to whom patriots should not listen. To me, that sounds suspiciously like a mechanism black hats use to shut down free speech and damage patriots' efforts to win back their captured government.
See at the PDJT impeachment trial how our adversaries are attacking his presumed-as-sinister comms! Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) brought up the debunked claim that PDJT used his appearance at the first presidential debate to communicate with the right-wing Proud Boys. This fantasy is promoted to pass for evidence at a former president's impeachment! We're presumably supposed to add this to the historical narrative of fictions that will need to be defended to avoid being sent to a re-education camp or at our trial as terrorists.
AS PDJT said, "They're actually coming after you; I'm just in their way!"
Imagine if that illusory paradigm were available to be used against any tidbit from LTG Flynn or Adm. Rogers!
I confidently maintain that both 1) the media phenomenon we know as Q has not authorized JOS to communicate on its behalf, and 2) that JOS has not drawn unto himself as if he is communicating on behalf of what we know as Q.
That's not to say JOS should or should not have disclosed facts he's chosen to disclose.
That paradigm has not been the case with Bill Hicks, A.K.A. Alex Jones, who owes his media presence to support from Mossad. AJ has claimed that InfoWars "has its own Q," apparently meaning an insider who has provided secret intel claimed to be on a par with Q's drops. In addition to that short-lived false aggrandizement, I believe AJ has since dropped use of this claim.
I'm confident that if Q were to disclose classified material in an unauthorized fashion that black hats would mercilessly use that to discredit the phenomenon (in its entirety, including all Trump supporters) as they have through other angles, such as calling it a "conspiracy theory," labeling its supporters as "terrorists," and many times getting them fired from their jobs wherever an opportunity seems to arise, even using FBI-gathered information to do so.
Beyond the phenom we know as Q, it is also a U.S. Department of Energy nuclear clearance. People that have a Q clearance should not be understood necessarily to have anything to do with the domestic and/or international Q phenomenon that is in our vernacular the communication outlet of a person or team of persons who are keeping patriots informed of otherwise generally not-known (We The People) government information and habbenings.
JOS, IMHO, is unquestionably a Q supporter and wouldn't consciously damage the cause. Without making any claim whatsoever as to Q's wider adoption of any JOS input, I happen to know JOS has anonymously participated in providing crumbs on that board that we're not supposed to mention or link to. Such crumbs would not appropriately be considered outside comms, but inside, within the veil, wouldn't they?
Why are you getting so upset about peoples’ opinions on JOS?
WY (recently) "Why are you getting so upset about peoples’ opinions on JOS?"
I'm neither "so upset" nor "personally offended about people's opinions of JOS."
Are you a psychiatrist IRL, to think so confidently that you have a window into my mind and repeatedly can read out what I'm thinking? (You might consider that you're the only person who's posted such nonsense. FWIW, I've been encouraged by posters here to share what I know and think about JOS.)
re 2021. Why is that addressed to me?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.