Posted on 12/18/2020 9:51:25 AM PST by John Leland 1789
“Pushing Vaccines But Not Therapeutics. Why?”
because effective therapeutics won’t allow the fascist left to maintain THE TERROR of the citizenry in order to destroy millions of small businesses, and isolate we peasants so they can easily control a few giant mega-corporations and prevent we peasants from effectively organizing, whereas vaccinations are a sop that will continue the uncertainty for years and allow THE TERROR to continue to be perpetuated. COVID serves the U.S. fascist left in a role similar to that with which the Jews served in NAZI Germany.
What about the millions already suffering? Why are they neglected in the picture? Nobody knows yet what they will get in the vaccine, or the side affects six months hence; two years; eight years.
they are not being neglected. therapeutics are being worked on and rolled out continuously. the question was why is the vaccine preferable to therapeutics. the answer is you don’t have to treat what you don’t get
What therapeutics are administered early in the illness in the region where you live?
Our state representative himself is a pharmacist and owns a pharmacy in our town. I called him about this. He told me that the state has no restriction against prescribing several effective medications, but that many doctors are afraid to prescribe because of pressure opposing the drugs from the AMA, NIH, and CDC.
We use multiple therapies in the hospital including remdesivir, decadron. and convalescent plasma. We do not have access to regenerons antibody cocktail yet but there is a study in town. In addition we use famotidine, anticoagulants in varying doses, vitamin D and conventional antibiotics if indicated. There may be more going on in the hospital than you think. For those sent home the biggest thing is to monitor oxygen levels several times a day, aspirin, famotidine, vitamin d and zinc or a mineral containing multivitamin.
That’s provided the vaccines are efficacious. And that if we’re talking two shots, people get both jabs.
Where you are, why are therapeutics not prescribed for use at home?
Why is the news media so mute about therapeutics. Why do we hear “Vaccine,” “Vaccine,” “Vaccine” hour-after-hour on news broadcasts, but no reports at all about doctors or laboratories, or pharma companies working hard to develop better therapeutics? Why is the impression left with the public that “vaccines are the ONLY way to get a handle on this illness” as Steven Hahn, FDA Director stated?
remdesivir abs plasma are IV medications and a bit difficult for home use. decadron is usually not started unless there is an oxygen requirement and that usually means hospitalization at least for a short time. Most who do it require hospitalization do not require therapeutics to recover completely i. a relatively short period of time
i can’t control the news media. therapeutics are being developed and used and are helping but none are the magic bullet or better than preventing if i. the first place
If therapeutics are being used so widely, then WHY are such hearings even necessary? Why does Dr. Pierre Kory have to plead so passionately for something as simple as Ivermectin to be made available? Did you watch those hearings?
Those hearings would not have taken place if therapeutics were so widely distributed and used. Dr. Kory represents a large group of physicians that have written volumes of peer reviewed studies. He didn't believe during his testimony that nearly enough attention is paid to therapeutics.
Why should I believe it? My state rep. who is a long-time pharmacist doesn't believe it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.