Posted on 12/18/2020 12:00:19 AM PST by ransomnote
Thanks for checking. I checked yet again. I’m still getting 4. It’s got to be a tech issue. I’m getting jumpy with the stuff going on.
**
5 here.
I was quoting Fatima post of the trunews tweet and G_W’s post tracing the source and caution about it, to show that all needs checking as much as we can.
.
Excellent article!
Steven W. wrote:
https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the-2020-presidential-election-is-deeply-puzzling/
1. Late on election night, with Trump comfortably ahead, many swing states stopped counting ballots. In most cases, observers were removed from the counting facilities. Counting generally continued without the observers
2. Statistically abnormal vote counts were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large in size (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio
3. Late arriving ballots were counted. In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots have impossible postal return dates and another 86,000 have such extraordinary return dates they raise serious questions
4. The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail-in ballot envelopes, which must contain signatures
5. Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting. Such is Biden’s narrow margin that, as political analyst Robert Barnes observes, ‘If the states simply imposed the same absentee ballot rejection rate as recent cycles, then Trump wins the election’
6. Missing votes. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing
7. Non-resident voters. Matt Braynard’s Voter Integrity Project estimates that 20,312 people who no longer met residency requirements cast ballots in Georgia. Biden’s margin is 12,670 votes
8. Serious ‘chain of custody’ breakdowns. Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases, that is, they had not been mailed in envelopes as required by law
9. Statistical anomalies. In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened.
Sidney Powell as Special Prosecutor on election
fraud will fire-hose the kraken.
ThankQ, Fatima!
Ping to meeting between PDJT and Sidney Powell.
fatima wrote:
“JUST IN - Sidney Powell was reportedly in the Oval Office last night as President Trump discussed making her Special Counsel for election fraud (NYT).
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1340353839740968961?s=20
sheep whisperer, what info does one need to provide, in order to purchase the video?
Thanks Bags ((((Hugs)))) .Santa came by on a fire truck today and waved at me.:)
Could be your computer is running slow. Reboot your PC and try again.
Simply because one is a judge doesn't mean you can't have negative personal opinions about a litigant.
However, it'll be a severe strike against you--an impeachable offense, really--that you make other members of the court brow-beatingly aware of your strong animus against the leader of the Executive Branch, a priori, without consideration of any merits or even standing.
It'll be a second impeachable strike against the CJ to declare he will insure the president will be kept from re-election by of the CJ's actions. (Strangely channeling Strzok's comments and animus.) We mustn't forget, CJ was talking about removing the court of last resort for an election case from PDJT's options to be heard.
But the CJ certainly pegs the sedition meter in declining to recuse himself in light of such previous statements when just such a court case concerning PDJT's re-election comes before the court, e.g. Texas vs PA.
Very interesting, ichabod1 !
Prayered UP and prepped UP!!
“Cabala Harris “
Lin Wood, ICWUDT !
Anyone know what that means?
Wow, good sleuthing!
Simply because one is a judge doesn’t mean you can’t have negative personal opinions about a litigant.
However, it’ll be a severe strike against you—an impeachable offense, really—that you make other members of the court brow-beatingly aware of your strong animus against the leader of the Executive Branch, a priori, without consideration of any merits or even standing.
It’ll be a second impeachable strike against the CJ to declare he will insure the president will be kept from re-election by of the CJ’s actions. (Strangely channeling Strzok’s comments and animus.) We mustn’t forget, CJ was talking about removing the court of last resort for an election case from PDJT’s options to be heard.
But the CJ certainly pegs the sedition meter in declining to recuse himself in light of such previous statements when just such a court case concerning PDJT’s re-election comes before the court, e.g. Texas vs PA
****************************
Excellent, supurb rx.
Looks like she's eating Christmas.
re: canes
A stick beats a knife as a weapon, especially on defense.
As a Seasoned Citizen, my oak stick with solid brass head raises no eyebrows anywhere; just a nice fashion accessory and mobility aid for an older gentleman.
One TSA agent,after running my stick through his scanner, commented “You know, this would make a really good weapon” as he smacked the brass head into the palm of his hand before smiling and handing it back to me.
If you are old enough or bold enough to carry a walking stick, I heartily recommend it.
She’s a halfer.
She half asses everything.
Hair half dyed, hair half shaved, tattoos half done, uses half a brain, half done maturing.
So no to abort, there’s still half a chance she changes.
Just disown Miss Smarty Pants until she gets her shit together.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.