Posted on 09/04/2020 9:25:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
A HUGE THANK YOU again, just another reminder to let you know how much this daily report is appreciated and how much I look forward to it each day!! Not so much the numbers but your synopsis each day!!
I actually wouldn't completely rule that out...
FWIW -
Newborn Human Baby Blood Shown to Reverse Age Related Diseases.
A recent scientific study published in the scientific Journal Nature has born out the possibility that components of the blood of newborn human babies could actually reverse many of the problems associated with cognitive and other impairments due to aging.
Sounds like far-fetched conspiracy theory bs, right?
How about this from Stanford University...
Study shows protein in human umbilical cord blood rejuvenates old mice’s impaired learning, memory.
Umbilical cord blood from human newborns, and in particular a single protein contained in it, boosted old mice’s brain function and cognitive performance, new research from Stanford shows.
The researchers identified a protein, abundant in human cord blood but decreasingly so with advancing age, that had the same effect when injected into the animals.
The findings could lead to new treatments for age-associated declines in mental ability.
“Neuroscientists have ignored it and are still ignoring it, but to me it’s remarkable that something in your blood can influence the way you think,” said the study’s senior author, Tony Wyss-Coray, PhD, professor of neurology and neurological sciences and a senior research career scientist at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System. The lead author is former postdoctoral scholar Joseph Castellano, PhD, who is now an instructor of neurology and neurological sciences.
The study was published online April 19, 2017 in Nature.
The researchers identified a protein, abundant in human cord blood but decreasingly so with advancing age, that had the same effect when injected into the animals.
The findings could lead to new treatments for age-associated declines in mental ability.
Hmmm - Gropin Joe's recent IV mark?
Check this out:
/\/\/\/\/\/\
What Do the Courts Consider in a Conspiracy Case?
By FindLaw Staff | Reviewed by Maddy Teka, Esq. | Last updated June 02, 2020
A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. A person may be convicted of conspiracy even if the actual crime was never committed.
For example, Jason, Alice, and Hank plan a bank robbery. They 1) visit the bank first to assess its security, and 2) pool their money and buy a gun. All three can be charged with conspiracy to commit robbery, regardless of whether the robbery itself is ever attempted or completed.
The “Agreement” Requirement
You might be wondering how exactly an agreement between two co-conspirators is formed. There’s no need for formalities. For instance, in the above example, Hank isn’t required to tell Jason and Alice in unequivocal terms, “I agree to commit a crime with you” (although that statement would surely be a prosecutor’s dream). Instead, an agreement may be implied from the circumstances, such as where Hank and his two companions hold a meeting to plan the crime.
The Element of “Intent”
As with other specific intent crimes, a person’s intention is key. But the court will also care about the mental states of the alleged partners in crime. Other individuals in the conspiracy must intend to agree, and all must intend to achieve the outcome.
Merely associating with people known to be involved in crime doesn’t make you a co-conspirator. For instance, just because your friend tells you he is going to burglarize a house doesn’t mean you are part of the conspiracy. Not unless you also agree to participate by acting as a getaway driver or helping him scope out the property ahead of time.
In most jurisdictions, at least one co-conspirator must take some concrete step in furtherance of the plan. In the bank robbery example, this could be rental of a car to use in the crime. The requirement of an overt act prevents people from being thrown in jail for merely talking about a crime. If three drunken friends at a bar speculate about how they would rob a bank together, and none of them ever undertakes any sort of actual action, there’s no criminal conspiracy. The intent requirement likely wouldn’t be satisfied in that scenario, either.
Penalties
Under the federal conspiracy statute, the offense is punishable by up to five years imprisonment, plus fines. A significantly lower penalty applies if the object of the conspiracy was merely a misdemeanor (e.g., you conspire to commit vandalism); in that case, the sentence for conspiracy can’t exceed the maximum penalty for the misdemeanor. Under state law, the punishments for conspiracy vary.
Prosecutors commonly charge conspiracy whenever two or more offenders act in tandem. A person can be convicted both of an underlying crime and of conspiracy to commit it, and receive separate punishments for each offense.
Charged With Criminal Conspiracy? You’ll Want a Good Attorney.
It’s finally happening. https://t.co/QtaQNEZEc5— Julian's Rum 🥃 (@JuliansRum) September 7, 2020
.@realDonaldTrump scolds a reporter for wearing a mask:
"You’re going to have to take that off, please.
How many feet are you away? Well, if you don’t take it off, you are very muffled. So, if you would take it off it would be a lot easier..." pic.twitter.com/64l8N0yLdq— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 7, 2020
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You're welcome, and thank you!
Like ALL of us here, as far as I can tell, I try and supply a little bit of antidote to the FAKE NEWS and other lies in which we are inundated daily.
WWG1WGA
Back then (and probably still) there was a small group of “Expert witness” psychologists who flew around the country from trial to trial, “debunking” the testimony of the child victims, inventing a new condition (mostly FAKE) called “False Memory Syndrome.”
Anyway, all those “Expert” shrinks turned out to be members of pro-pedophile organizations like NAMBLA.
These people are sick.
Kinda like this, but much cooler:
Yeah, and where can I get me summadat?
I kinda thought family ‘y’ was the Rothschilds, with y meaning the male chromosome contribution. Perhaps tracing lineage back to Cain.
Bags, my friend, I’m warning you right now to stay off the Q-anon thread that has popped up outside the hedges.
Yes, most of them act like they just fell off the turnip truck, and are hence unaware of our FReeQ thread with hundreds of thousands of entries since Q #1 and links to tremendous resources, many of them far more credible than any blog since they were created by fellow FReepers.
But this has to be wilful ignorance assuming they possess at least room temperature I.Q.; so, in either case you can’t really “Save” them.
Forgive him father, for he knows not what he does.
Said again in music language.
p.s. The intent is not to save. The intent is to punish.
*donning riot gear and heading out*
Ahahahahahahaha.
#Madcap
Sorry to hear that. It always amazed me how people were so calm around storms. I would be hiding in the closet. Still scared to death when they are bad but I’ve gotten better lol
Really to everyone who posted about near death misses, and I haven’t been able to read every comment; plus many of us had other close encounters who did not comment about them.
Every day is a Gift.
That is why it is called the Present.
Would be useful. Wonder if that protein can be found elsewhere or synthesized.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.