.@realDonaldTrump looks over the Border Wall with a member of the Border Patrol as he participates in a Commemoration of the 200th Mile of New Border Wall in San Luis, AZ
Posted on 06/01/2020 8:50:37 AM PDT by weston
Sorry it has come to this. Please share my final social media post.pic.twitter.com/h8An9EYfP8— Carpe Donktum🔹 (@CarpeDonktum) June 23, 2020
She’s probably also “Bambi” on the Sex Talk Hotline
ROFLOL!!!!!!
Blocking John Bolton from becoming Sec of State was one of my proudest moments! I’m sure @realDonaldTrump, in retrospect, said: “that son of a gun Rand Paul is right - Bolton is nothing but a warmonger, a liar and a loser!
https://t.co/SBhnYaFB2s— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 23, 2020
https://www.wmal.com/2020/06/22/us-moves-to-restrict-chinese-media-outlets-as-propaganda/
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration said Monday that it is designating the U.S. operations of four Chinese media outlets as “foreign missions” in an action that could force some of their journalists to leave the country and further worsen diplomatic relations.
State Department officials said the four organizations are essentially mouthpieces for the Chinese Communist Party and the government and should not be treated like ordinary foreign media.
The four, which include state-run CCTV, will be required to submit a list of everyone who works for them in the U.S. and any real estate holdings. None are being ordered to leave at this time, but a similar action in February against five other outlets preceded a cap on the number of people who could work for those organizations in the U.S.
The other three are the China News Service, the People’s Daily newspaper and the Global Times.
“The Communist Party does not just exercise operational control over these propaganda entities but has full editorial control over their content,” said Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs David Stilwell. “This foreign mission designation is an obvious step in increasing transparency of these and other PRC government propaganda activities in the United States.”
The U.S. designated Soviet outlets as foreign missions during the Cold War. That precedent reflects the bitter state of relations between the United States and China, which are at odds over Beijing’s response to the coronavirus outbreak, trade, human rights and other issues.
U.S. officials say the media outlets should be considered foreign missions under American law because they are “substantially owned or effectively controlled” by the government of the People’s Republic of China and shouldn’t be treated like traditional news organizations.
“These aren’t journalists. These are members of the propaganda apparatus in the PRC,” Stillwell said in a conference call with reporters.
In February, the administration took the same action against the Xinhua News Agency, China Global Television Network, China Radio International, the China Daily Distribution Corporation, which distributes the newspaper of the same name, and Hai Tian Development USA, which distributes the People’s Daily newspaper.
Then in March, the U.S. administration capped the number of journalists from the five allowed to work in the U.S. at 100, down from about 160. At the time, the U.S. cited China’s increasingly harsh surveillance, harassment and intimidation of American and other foreign journalists in China.
The administration also said it plans to set time limits on the visas issued to Chinese journalists, as China does now for journalists working for U.S. outlets.
It was not yet clear how many journalists work in the U.S. for the organizations designated Monday.
As of this spring, there were about 75 Americans and other foreigners authorized to work for U.S. news outlets inside China.
Watch video to the end.
Carpe Donktum is just trolling, not leaving.
More Jimmy Kimmel blackface
Jimmy Kimmel Blackface Oprah Jimfrey The Man Show (2001)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1By6Wj_sAU&feature=youtu.be
MOMENTS AGO: President Trump signs the border wall. pic.twitter.com/bQhk4wgbmq— The Hill (@thehill) June 23, 2020
.@realDonaldTrump looks over the Border Wall with a member of the Border Patrol as he participates in a Commemoration of the 200th Mile of New Border Wall in San Luis, AZ
He’s autographing the wall?
Undercover Huber
58m
So hearsay then. From a guy who signed his name to the incredibly misleading
@GeorgePapa19
statement of the offense. If this is the best Nadler’s got this hearing on Wed will go as well as Mueller’s
********************************
Kyle Cheney
NEWS: Aaron ZELINSKY, a prosecutor in Stone’s case, describes significant political pressure in DOJ.
“What I heard – repeatedly – was that Roger Stone was being treated differently from any other defendant because of his relationship to the President.”
https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/zelinsky_opening_statement_hjc.pdf?utm_campaign=4024-519
*************************
“I was explicitly told that the motivation for changing the sentencing memo was
political, and because the U.S. Attorney was “afraid of the President.”
https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/zelinsky_opening_statement_hjc.pdf?utm_campaign=4024-519
********************
NEW: Roger STONE prosecutor says he was pressured by DOJ leaders to cut the Trump confidant “a break” during sentencing — because of Stone’s relationship with Trump.
******************
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/23/prosecutor-says-he-was-pressured-to-cut-roger-stone-a-break-because-of-his-ties-to-trump-336075
**************
“[W]e were told by a supervisor that the U.S. Attorney had political reasons for his instructions, which our supervisor agreed was unethical and wrong,” Zelinsky says. “However, we were instructed that we should go along with the U.S. Attorney’s instructions, because this case was ‘not the hill worth dying on’ and that we could ‘lose our jobs’ if we did not toe the line.”
But the four prosecutors persisted and ultimately were told to file their sentencing recommendation on Feb. 10 but to omit descriptions of Stone’s conduct. Hours later, just before 3 a.m. on Feb. 11, Trump assailed the prosecutors in the case, calling their recommendation for seven to nine years — which was based on sentencing guidelines that prosecutors routinely employ — “horrible and very unfair.”
Q #5404 available
**NEW: @TwitterSafety places a notice on Pres. Trump's tweet from this morning for "violating our policy against abusive behavior, specifically, the presence of a threat of harm against an identifiable group." pic.twitter.com/TC9HAhhznj— Patrick Hussion (@PatrickHussion) June 23, 2020
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.