Posted on 03/05/2020 12:49:32 AM PST by Morgana
Perhaps all three. Or a combination of them.
Tagline
“...they are haunted for the rest of their lives.”
You give them too much credit. If they were concerned about the act, then why didn’t they prevent it from happening? I can promise you that there are a large amount of women in the group that are not going to give bad feelings a second thought. If the ones that I’m talking about, the ones getting rid of the child for convenience and not for any other purpose like rape or illness, then why would they abort if they are going to suffer in the future? And you can’t, unfortunately, have the government stepping in to determine the validity of abortion as with what they can determine legitimizes both aspects. One may be reasonable, the other is nothing more than murder.
rwood
“Kill the baby”, the DemocRAT party Prime Directive since the 70s.
Abortion was not legalized by the actions of the female subset of he electorate. Between the late 60's and the early 70's, a quite limited legalization of criminal abortion was OK'd in a handful of states (Ny, CA), but turned back in an even greater number of instances by the electorate (male and female) at the state level.
Then it was forced on the entire country by nine unelected, black-robed MEN in the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973.
Something we never asked for, that they gave us--- good and hard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.