Posted on 02/08/2020 4:09:28 PM PST by ransomnote
Hey Gen, I just watched the clip of J Phoenix accepting his golden oskar at awards ceremony. Did you catch his final statement?
~~~~~~~~~~
“When he was 17, my brother wrote this lyric. He said run to the rescue with love and peace will follow.”
~~~~~~~~~~
What was it Q said about coincidences again?
(excerpt)
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) is demanding answers from Attorney General William Barr about a Justice Department "intake process" that will review information on Ukraine from President Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani.
In a letter sent to the attorney general, Nadler called on Barr to provide a "complete explanation" regarding his decision to sidestep standard practice and set up another channel for information coming out of Ukraine. He asked the attorney general to answer 11 questions related to the arrangement by Feb. 25.
What's fatbody so worried about, I wonder?
Ahahahahahaha.
gisd O
That fairly well summarizes my memory of the matter. I read Wikipedia on the sexting thing but it only mentioned 'devices seized' and no detaiils. Good ol' Wiki...
heh, heh. Better yet, if only it were Schiffilosi.
Whew, you’ve cleared up that Recall thingy for me. Thanks.
The PUBLIC is getting RED PILLED! “Q’ research is paying off!!!
Not just Bidens! Kerry, Romney, Clintons, Pelosi, Soros are ALL tied to Ukraine
https://www.wnd.com/2020/02/not-just-bidens-kerry-romney-clintons-pelosi-soros-tied-ukraine/
Ultimately, exposure of project mockingbird and arrests of a handful of big name news personalities will likely be needed to expose the MSM. With regards to some in the MSM being indicted, Q says as much in post 32:
Q #32
Maybe one day but it cannot go slow. The initial wave will be fast and meaningful. It will send a signal to others immediately and youll see the tide turn (not even the MSM can hide and rest assured some will be jailed as deep cover agents).
What in the name of Zeus’ eyeballs is wrong with Faux that they won’t even cover Trump’s rallies. I missed it because I thought it was on later.
I already watch Dobbs, now I will just have to stay on Faux Business with Trish and Kennedy. Regular Faux will have to be Saturday night only Watters/Janine/Gutfeld.
The regular Faux channel has become completely unwatchable for me. The fawning Jill Biden interview with the 10:00 o’clock girl was the last straw.
Will we ever have better choices?
The QANONIAD (Trademark)
This meeting will come to order. (Or not.. ;-)
~Easy
Always liked that movie.
(Okay, mostly for the car. Got my first driver’s license in a 426 Hemi Dodge.)
All well and good; but Nancy Pelosi is talking about attacking DoJ with armed troops and patriot groups are wondering if a repeat of Lexington and Concord might soon be necessary (e.g.: Virginia.) Perhaps we can't wait XXX more years for treason to be explained and prosecuted.
<< The regular Faux channel has become completely unwatchable for me. “ >>
FOX NEWS Saturday and Day time programming is a royal pain.
Day time is much better on FOX BUSINESS, with early AM Maria Bartaroma and Varney, both three hours of mixed news of finance, econ and TRUMP accomplishments.
LOU DOBBS saves viewers on FOX BUSINESS from MCCALLUM on the FOX news side.
FOX PRIME TIME is still beseiged with pontificating hosts, interrupting, but seriously good guests, well informed, but who can scarcely get their informed presentation out, for all the verbosity blowing in.
VERY DISTURBING STATEMENT by JOE BIDEN. The purpose of a militia is to defend our nation when called upon by the President, not "take on" the government. What is he insinuating???
Biden: "Those who say 'the tree of liberty is watered with the blood of patriots' -- a great line, well, guess what: The fact is, if youre going to take on the government you need an F-15 with Hellfire Missiles. There is no way an AK-47 is going to take care of you."
Thank God Donald is in charge and not Joe.
Anons noting this...
Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers: Doyle, Moynihan vs. IRS
In a December 2018 Congressional hearing on Not-for-Profit
Charities with a Specific Case Study on the Clinton
Foundation, our nation was introduced to two private
individuals who had undertaken a multi-year investigative
probe of the 43rd President’s foundation. Larry Doyle and
John Moynihan informed those observing that they filed a
formal Whistleblower Submission replete with a hundred-plus
formal exhibits in excess of 6,000 pages of evidence with
the Internal Revenue Service on the Clinton Foundation in
August 2017. They further testified that they had submitted
the same materials to the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and selected US Attorneys in the Department of Justice as
well...
...Ultimately, Doyle and Moynihan maintained that the
Clinton Foundation could be subject to paying tax on
anywhere from $400mm to potentially as much as $2.5 billion
of revenue.
These whistleblowers informed those watching that the IRS
had issued a Preliminary Denial of their Submission shortly
before they provided their riveting testimony to the House
Oversight and Government Reform Committee during that
December 13, 2018 hearing. During that hearing, Moynihan
specifically emphasized that their submission was “a tax
claim”. Moynihan also informed those on the committee that
depending on how the IRS ruled that the two whistleblowers
would have other causes of action that they could and would
pursue including filing an appeal to the US Tax Court if in
fact they received a Final Denial from the IRS.
Well, it appears that these two ‘financial bounty hunter’
whistleblowers have done just that. How is that appeal
playing out? It looks like over the course of the last few
months Doyle and Moynihan have been in the midst of an
extensive array of motions and responses, many filed under
seal, going back and forth with IRS Counsel in the course of
their having their day in the US Tax Court v the Internal
Revenue Service.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/clinton-foundation-whistleblowers-doyle-moynihan-vs-irs
Those interested in the case can track it via this US Tax Court site:
https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/UstcDockInq/DocketDisplay.aspx?DocketNo=19004865
Oversight of Nonprofit Organizations: A Case Study on the Clinton Foundation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.