Posted on 12/22/2019 11:31:02 AM PST by ransomnote
I saw your pings, Bitt. I just couldn’t respond to them. Very frustrating.
I’ve been watching.
-SB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THANKQ for the updated links, Farcesensitive. I will use them to update our resource table. :D
New Q Drops~received earlier this evening
Link to view drops on https://qmap.pub
New Q Drops~received earlier this evening
Link to view drops on https://qmap.pub
I think it’s clear from these drops that 0bola ain’t getting away with it.
Has there been any conclusion about who is pulling Pelosi the puppet’s strings? I haven’t had much time for FR today or lately.
Ahhh, the Admiral of great qmerit. One of the qten. Who among them knew more? Nobody.
bitt wrote:
“
https://twitter.com/FederalistNo78/status/1030360913671598081
Calif. attorney general plans to repeal Prop 13, raise property taxes by $12.5B every year
4 MIN VIDEO”
Link goes to tweets about ham radio.
Then at the bottom it mentions a suspended account.
????
Lindsay Graham said on Maria today that there will be a trial using identical rules as the Clinton impeachment; House Managers will present the RAT case; President’s attorneys (including Ratcliffe etc. from House) will present President’s case; senators get to vote on witnesses, meaning: NEITHER SIDE WILL BE ALLOWED TO CALL ANY WITNESSES.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If Senators get to vote on witnesses, why will neither side be allowed to call any witnesses? Excuse me for dumb.
I thought I, I, I said that! LOL! Regardless, I too believe it. Every Branch is going to have to pony up. The constitutional crisis is Not going to hang on a resolution of a bunch of belching senators and one creative Chief Justice. Nope.
And all the tweets are dated 2018.
Now I’m totally confuzzled.....
ThankQ, I love Gregorian chants, thanks for reminding me.
The case has already been done in the house, the case is NOW or whenever turned over to the jury (Senate)!
R Majority votes no on witnesses and who knows.. maybe a Dem or TWO. Maybe....
arggghhhhhh...too many links, too little brains.
MARXISTS NEWSOM & BECERRA TRYING TO DECEIVE THE PEOPLE OF CA AGAIN
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Only if their actual objective were removal of the President ... something not even AOC could possibly believe will happen.
But logic means nothing to communists, as indicated by their wildly insane policies such as the "Green New Deal," open borders and turning major cities into open latrines where crooks are given all respect and police are vilified.
IN A NUTSHELL: If the House of Representatives continues completely rogue, perhaps continues to add fictitious charges to faux impeachments and batter the Senate with them, THEN HOW ARE THEY TO BE STOPPED?
They may have found a way to get the Constitutional process to shake itself to pieces ... and thus we win every battle but lose the war.
I am certainly no Constitutional scholar (thus pinging Defiant), but as I understand it the power of the SCOTUS was partly self-created, in Marbury v. Madison. Stepping out beyond these boundaries would be problematical for SCOTUS especially at this extremely divided point in our history.
I am worried about the potential that the RATs wish to deliberately provoke a destructive Constitutional crisis which will leave America weaker as a nation; and, that the merits or lack thereof of their insane impeachment efforts may have little bearing on the outcome.
I call a redo:
https://twitter.com/FederalistNo78/status/1030360913671598081
@FederalistNo78
“Since comms have come up again I figured I’d post some interesting HAM radio licenses again. I’m not sure the people are who they look like yet..interesting none the less.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.