Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2020 Democrat Tulsi Gabbard doesn't back impeachment despite formal inquiry
Washington Examiner ^ | 09-25-19 | Mike Brest

Posted on 09/25/2019 9:30:28 AM PDT by Monrose72

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Menehune56

That’s why I think letting Hellary run again might not be a bad thing for the Rats.

1. This time she lose even more decisively, no excuses possible,

2. Discredits the Clinton cabal once and for all. Removes even the possibility of something being significantly resurrected through Chelsea.

3. Hard left either gets on board with Hellary again or goes 3rd party and then rides off into irrelevant fringes from which they came. If they stick with Hellary they fall with Hellary.


21 posted on 09/25/2019 10:15:26 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

Being hot and being a veteran doesn’t give her a pass for being a idiot Democrat. She thinks she is slick acting like a “moderate”. Bad mouthing Trump at every microphone is cheap politics and of course she wants Trump impeached irregardless what she says.


22 posted on 09/25/2019 10:20:39 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karma_Sherab
She looks like she’s a bit “nippy”

I don't have a problem with that. At the moment, the Dem House is led by a definitely non-nippy Nancy.

23 posted on 09/25/2019 10:28:54 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Yes, there’s people that believe every photo is legit on their page!


24 posted on 09/25/2019 10:46:58 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

um... oh.


25 posted on 09/25/2019 11:08:49 AM PDT by jimjohn (2020: The year the Republicans can and should take back the black vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

Snake in the grass is right.

I’ve always stated that Kamala Harris is going to be the nominee, because she ticks more of their Identity Politics checkboxes than anyone else. However, if the Dems get a sudden bout of hangover realization that full-throated communism is not the way to beat Trump in 2020, then they realize they have the most “sensible” candidate in Major Gabbard, and even Kamala will be thrown under the bus.

Remember, Major Gabbard violated the UCMJ for calling Trump a derogatory name. UCMJ does NOT apply to Congressional privilege, and she’s certainly under Trump’s command. As a military officer, she has limitations that Americans not under Trump’s command are allowed to have. Note that she can actively and aggressively campaign AGAINST Trump, and in fact there is certain political leeway she has in denouncing Trump, but that is not the same thing as calling him a pimp.

In any case, though, if Gabbard were the nominee, I would be more concerned than any other candidate to go up against Trump in the general. My own Spidey-sense says as much.


26 posted on 09/25/2019 11:25:09 AM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

She is what a Democrat should be, a thoughtful loyal US citizen.


27 posted on 09/25/2019 11:50:59 AM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

uh, washingtonexaminer, it’s NOT a formal inquiry unless the full House voted to make it one ...


28 posted on 09/25/2019 12:14:08 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozy

That would be something to take up with the author. Nancy’s big announcement was a nothing burger. Nothing has changed because there has been no formal vote by the house.


29 posted on 09/25/2019 3:19:56 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson