Let women who have had abortions and were injured by it or who bitterly regretted it --- and there must be at least a million of them ----sue the abortionists into the ground.
You would expect this kind of crap from CNN. CNN is not a news station but a propaganda generater for the liberals. Male politicians will get questions from the remaining baby-killing Ghouls who are trying desperately to hang on to Roe vs Wade. They know it is going down. They know it and are scared to death that they may get pregnant and will have to carry it full term and then deal with it.
Mother Teresa's declaration may be the most powerful statement in 2016 from which to begin discussions of murder, ambushes, and terrorists among us.
The sole reason these rights were deemed unalienable is that both are derived from the Creator--not from the mother or father, and not from government or judicial decision. What is "granted" by human decision also can, by implication, be withheld.
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them (life and liberty)," said Thomas Jefferson.
"The world is different now. . . and yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God." - John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address
That understanding underlies every other consideration embodied in our Declaration of Independence and every protection of our Constitution. It is the very basis of our rights to life and liberty, of laws to protect them, and it distinguishes ours from other forms of government.
When we fail to acknowledge that foundation of our liberty, then we risk liberty itself for future generations, for where does the right to choose who lives and who does not really end?
That is why the question is of vital importance in each election. Already, we have deprived millions of their Creator-endowed rights to life and liberty, and our nation must be weaker for their loss. We need leaders who understand the implications and potential consequences of departing from our founding principles.
In recent decades, technological advances have enabled us to observe the characteristics and actions of God's tiniest creations in the womb. Unlike previous generations who could not see, we have no excuse for imagining that these are mere blobs of tissue labeled "fetuses." In their early weeks, we now can see that they are living babies who will continue on to possess life and liberty if we do not "destroy" both. Indeed, they are simply smaller versions of ourselves.
Questions on the economy, taxes, threats from terrorists, health care--all are considerations at this election time. One, however, is basic to all others for me. Who will best protect the underlying premise of our Constitution--and the lives and liberties of millions yet unborn?
Promises are illusive and cheap. This voter will examine each candidate's previous voting record carefully on all issues, because past actions are the best predictors of future decisions.
If I were a politician, I would note that my mother, wife, and daughter are at least as opposed to abortion as I am and I’m a hardcore opponent.
“Real men protect babies even unborn ones.”
And REAL men can handle the politically immoral without much *discomfort* at all.
So says this real and authentically feminine woman! ;- )
I doubt it.
“Real men protect babies even unborn ones.”
And REAL men can handle the politically immoral without much *discomfort* at all.
So says this real and authentically feminine woman! ;- )
Male politicians who oppose abortion rights are going to face some snarly in-your-face radical feminist rent-a-mob hecklers.
There. Fixed it.