Posted on 04/16/2019 12:05:18 PM PDT by ransomnote
Boom!
There is a “woman hollering” creek in Texas supposedly named after the ghost of a woman who drowns her newborn and immediately regrets it. La llorona, in Spanish. http://www.texasescapes.com/TexasFolklore/WomanHolleringCreek/WomanHolleringCreek.htm
There is a horror movie in theaters now by the title of, La Llorona. I haven’t seen it. I would like to imagine it’s about Hillary after the election.
See my post 1942. I replied to Ortam but yours was the OP.
More at link
https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-20949,00.html
We have Q (17)!
I think the beast probably still has all those FBI files, but those were from the 90s, getting staler by the day. I’m sure she picked up lots more, but most of the original subjects are likely dead or gone.
We will never cede any color or the rainbow to any subversive or freak!
>>ten month old German Shepherd puppy ate
Long ago my Irish Wolfhound puppy started dragging around the house the combined seat and back cushions of the sofa. I was torn between distress and hysterical laughter. Another pup, with an insatiable hunger for knowledge, began eating the glue in the backs of my old books. And we can no longer have Christmas lights decorating the backyard as the squirrels eat the live wires.
KEK! That was Hillaryous!
I know people who heard what sounded like "a woman being murdered" while camping near the Delaware Water Gap. Considering that's just 50 miles from NYC, that's probably what they heard!
>>Silver lozenges
Your image saved and appreciated for future times of extremity.
Coat the cable with tobasco or something nasty the dog won’t like.
it was the elderberry wine.
I’ve always wondered who that kid is! I hope he is getting royalties on his meme-ability.
Stolen Archives Show the True History of Russia Collusion
By Daniel Ashman
FTA:
Numerous examples are provided in a soon to be released book, Judgment in Moscow, by the heroic Soviet dissident, Vladimir Bukovsky. He makes use of extensive first hand documents that he personally stole from Russia’s Central Committee (C.C.) archives, which have never before been accessible to Americans.
The media must be tripping over themselves to see what Bukovsky reveals...right?
Well, not so much. Because the C.C. documents demonstrate, irrefutably, that the American Establishment was the one willingly and repeatedly colluding with Russia — an inconvenient fact.
This is history that the mainstream media don’t want Americans to know. Bukovsky’s book was actually first published over two decades ago in many languages and countries. But not in America.
Random House said it would publish it but then demanded that Bukovsky fundamentally alter its content — downplay the infiltration of the West by Russia! Show how insignificant Russian actions were! — that Bukovsky had to walk away. Afterward, no American publisher would touch it.
That’s especially remarkable, given Bukovsky’s accomplished life. He spent over a decade in gulags, psychiatric wards, and labor camps and wrote a worldwide bestseller on it, To Build a Castle: My Life as a Dissenter. He then went on to be an adviser to President Reagan and a personal friend of Prime Minister Thatcher.
Imagine that! After such an extraordinary life, American publishers tried to lecture Bukovsky about what ideas on American-Russian relations were permissible. They really did not want to talk about Russian collusion up until just recently.
The true history of collusion explored in Judgment in Moscow will be accessible only due to the efforts of a tiny independent publisher, Ninth of November, who wanted to get the truth out.
...
Troll of unusual size. Posting from way behind lol.
https://spectator.org/slimy-group-therapy-for-the-trump-haters/
Slimy Group Therapy for the Trump Haters
by George Parry
FTA:
The Mueller Report is a 448 page-long primal scream of rage by the frustrated Hillary Clinton acolytes who wrote it and who utterly failed in their anointed mission to (a) lure President Trump into a General Flynn-style perjury trap and/or (b) goad him into obstructing their faux investigation of non-existent Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
Unable to find any evidence of actual criminality by the president, Team Mueller resorted to dirtying him up as much as possible for the benefit of their mainstream media and Democrat party fan clubs. This extra-prosecutorial exercise in character assassination was undoubtedly good group therapy for them and most likely will help them retain their social acceptability in progressive circles. But it had nothing to do with law enforcement as that term is understood in America.
In order to lay the predicate for criticizing the president, Team Mueller invented a whole new standard of criminal liability. In a real criminal investigation, the prosecutor makes an up or down decision. If there’s sufficient evidence supporting criminal charges, charges are brought. If the evidence is insufficient, none are filed, and the prosecutor keeps his or her mouth shut. That’s how the adults do it in real prosecutors’ offices. But with Team Mueller traditional adult ethical and legal standards of conduct appear not to apply.
When they couldn’t by hook, crook, trickery, or megathreats drum up enough evidence to justify charging the president with obstruction of justice, they saw fit to include this bit of creative writing in their report:
[I]f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
Apparently these Clinton sycophants believe that, unlike normal prosecutors, they have been endowed with super powers not only to decide whether or not a crime was committed, but also to exonerate the president if they so elect. Say what? Just who do they think they are and what body of law — including the special counsel statute — confers on them either the duty or power to exonerate anyone? Frankly, this arrogation of unprecedented extra-legal authority smacks of megalomaniacal insanity. Or maybe it’s just part of Team Mueller’s grieving process as they sift the ashes of their failed effort to destroy the hated Trump.
...
If you are looking for a high crime and misdemeanor to justify impeachment, there is no such crime as “obstruction of coup”. As a matter of fact, obstruction of coup would seem to be a patriotic act for which the president should be praised not impeached.
That’s the bad news, and, for Democrats, it only gets worse. Now that we have a sentient adult running the Justice Department, the true facts about the state sponsored coup are about to be unearthed. And, when that happens, Team Mueller’s shameful report will become an insignificant albeit sleazy footnote to the exposure and massive cleansing of the deep state that is about to occur.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.