Posted on 03/29/2019 10:46:18 AM PDT by teppe
A third of the world’s population lives on less than $2 per day.
Should America adopt our fair share of the world’s poor and cut our standard of living to about a fourth of what it currently is, including for those living on welfare and other government programs?
Median annual household income in America is over $56,000. But if you make over $32,400, you are in the top 1% worldwide. Are you obligated to allow the government to take 95+% to redistribute to the poor of the world?
If they really care for the poor, nothing is stopping them from giving as much of their own money as they wish.
Socialists are people who want to take other people’s money to either enrich themselves or make them feel virtuous for giving other people’s money to the poor.
Who in the Bible made this remark complaining about perfume being wasted when it was poured on Jesus?
John 12:5
Why was this fragrant oil not sold... and given to the poor?
Clue: v. 6
This he said, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief, and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it.
They don’t need to give up some of their GPA points; just install a system where there are no GPA’s, every class is pass or fail and there are no class standings because everyone is equal.
Not even the most virulently socialist university would inflict this on their students. But it would be nice to see it put to a vote at the Ivy League schools.
Sure, but that possibility is rapidly sinking in the sea of probabilities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.