It's impossible to learn about Trump's successes and strategy by following the MSM. If you
are interested in learning more about 'Q' and what's really going on in
our government, please click the links at the top of the table above to review
articles and videos which describe who/what Q is about.
Much preparation has gone into the strategy now unfolding in D.C.
The groundwork has been laid and the path to justice is almost cleared
of barriers. MAGA!
Our prior Q thread is here:
Q Anon: 10/20/18 Trust Trump's Plan
Ok, its probably just me, and this is a stretch.. But...
The first thing POTUS says in a tweet at 12:53 today, 28 Oct, is:
Thank you...
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1056589723911757824?s=21
Hmmm... ThankQ
(Happy Birthday, Q!)
PS. If I knew how to post an image of the tweet, I would... *sigh*
https://www.weeklystandard.com/eric-felten/victoria-nuland-cant-keep-her-steele-story-straight/
Victoria Nuland Cant Keep Her Steele Story Straight
Eric Felten
FTA:
Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland made a bombshell admission Wednesday at an otherwise quiet hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. She admitted that during the waning days of the 2016 election, the Obama State Department hosted ex-British-spy Christopher Steele to give a secret briefing to select staff on his anti-Trump dossier.
...
The revelation that there was a dossier briefing comes thanks to serious investigative work by chairman Richard Burrs committee staff and thanks, as well, to smart questioning by the senator. Based upon our review of the visitor logs at the State Department, Mr. Steele visited the State Department, briefing officials on the dossier in October of 2016, Burr said. Then he asked Nuland: Did you have any role in that briefing? (Note that Burr did not ask whether there was a briefing, he built the existence of the briefing into the structure of the question, leaving Nuland no room to deny it.)
What she did deny was participating in the briefingbut she had trouble keeping her story straight. Asked if she had any role, Nuland told the committee I did not. I actively chose not to be part of that briefing.
But you were aware of the briefing, Burr pressed.
I was not aware of it until afterwards, Nuland claimed.
So, lets see if we can sort this out: Nuland claims she actively chose not to be part of a briefing that she was not aware of until after it had happened. How is that possible?