Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 10/03/18 Trust Trump's Plan
qmap.pub ^ | 10/03/18 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 10/03/2018 10:25:50 AM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,281-2,3002,301-2,3202,321-2,3402,341-2,344 last
To: Bigg Red

I hope they do something quickly. He’s caused so much mayhem and destruction - all over the world! I’m sure he’ll be pulling out all the stops for voter fraud during the mid-terms.


2,341 posted on 10/06/2018 6:43:32 PM PDT by nanetteclaret (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2340 | View Replies]

To: Snowybear

Gotcha, thanks!


2,342 posted on 10/07/2018 9:57:23 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2338 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Oct 25, 2025 UPDATE:

Goodlatte Subpoenas McCabe Memos and Other Documents

Official Government Source: House Judiciary Committee Press Release

The primary government source for this subpoena is the official press release from the House Judiciary Committee Republicans, dated September 27, 2018. It details Chairman Bob Goodlatte's subpoena to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for documents related to the FBI's handling of the 2016 presidential election investigation. The release includes the text of the accompanying letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and references a detailed document schedule attached to the subpoena.

Link to Press Release: https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/goodlatte-subpoenas-mccabe-memos-and-other-documents

Description of Contents:

The letter to Sessions emphasizes that thousands of documents had already been reviewed, but the remaining materials were critical and had been delayed or refused despite repeated requests. It sets an implied deadline for production and notes procedures for handling classified materials.

Direct Links to Original Documents:

These PDFs contain the formal subpoena language under House Rule XI, directing the DOJ to produce the materials by October 4, 2018, at the Committee's offices.

More Informative Media Article: Washington Post Coverage

For additional context and analysis, a contemporary Washington Post article provides insight into the subpoena's timing and political motivations, noting its connection to contemporaneous reports about Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's alleged discussions (documented in McCabe's memos) of secretly recording President Trump.

Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/house-judiciary-panel-subpoenas-mccabe-memos-page-surveillance-documents/2018/09/27/e7c799d6-c28d-11e8-97a5-ab1e46bb3bc7_story.html

Description of Contents (from Article):

This subpoena was part of a broader series of Republican-led inquiries into the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation, but no public record indicates full compliance by the October deadline, as the session ended soon after. If you need excerpts from related subpoenas or further searches, let me know!

Today's date and time is 06:03 PM CDT on Saturday, October 25, 2025.

2,343 posted on 10/25/2025 4:06:31 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
For my reference: Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings took place from September 4 to September 7, 2018

During Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, senators focused on his views regarding the death penalty, particularly how he would approach cases involving combatants and military justice. Specific questions likely revolved around his stance on the legality and application of the death penalty in military contexts and how he would balance national security interests with individual rights. PBS Wikipedia

Questions on Combatants and the Death Penalty During Kavanaugh's Confirmation

Key Topics Addressed

  • Death Penalty Stance: Senators questioned Kavanaugh about his views on the death penalty, particularly regarding its application and the rights of combatants.

  • Military Commissions: There were inquiries about Kavanaugh's opinions on military commissions and how they relate to the treatment of combatants, especially in the context of capital punishment.

Notable Questions

  • Judicial Precedents: Senators asked Kavanaugh how he would approach cases involving the death penalty for combatants, referencing past Supreme Court decisions.

  • Constitutional Rights: Questions focused on whether combatants have the same constitutional protections as civilians when facing the death penalty.

  • International Law: Some senators raised concerns about how Kavanaugh's views align with international law regarding the treatment of combatants and the imposition of the death penalty.

Implications of Responses

Kavanaugh's responses to these questions were closely monitored, as they could indicate his judicial philosophy on capital punishment and the rights of individuals in military contexts.


2,344 posted on 10/25/2025 8:07:52 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2343 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,281-2,3002,301-2,3202,321-2,3402,341-2,344 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson