Do me next.
Bagster
Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Didn’t click LoL
Do me next.
Bagster
BOOM
Bagster
Also, some of Q’s sillier moments have to do with old CIA programs “MKULTRA” and “Operation Mockingbird.”
These were exposed and “supposedly” shut down completely in the ‘70s. Of course, I would not put it past the CIA to have revived/extended/expanded such programs in some form or other. BUT they certainly wouldn’t be going under THOSE code names after they were so publicly exposed and disgraced in the ‘70s. The fact that Q thinks those particular code names are still current and relevant indicates that he is versed in web-based conspiracy accounts but NOT in the least knowledgeable about any current CIA or secretive intel activities. For the CIA would never be using those code names NOW. If in fact the CIA has continued such programs they most surely would be under new code names and auspices. Therefore, Q is merely relying upon what he has read about those programs operating many decades ago.
Yes.
You summed it up SO well! Nothing I can add—it was perfect
+1
You may join my church of Bagology. We wear white nikes.
Of course, you are uninterested in actually learning anything that might upset your silly Q-cult. We can see that. Stay in your little Q-bubble.
Oh no. Have I awoken the dragon?
*shiver*
Bagster
Plenty of the info is factual, but that is irrelevant.
The overall context is a series of big thumping obvious LIES.
Yes, I have long said there are many true and interesting details offered, but that does not make the overall landscape of “Q-world” plausible.
Q scours the news and the great WorldWideWeb, throws together “drops” now amounting to more than 1,000, and cult members go gaga over it all. Many obvious mistakes are not noticed or willingly ignored in order to promote the worship of Q.
Don’t worry, I will never be part of the Q-cult. I’d try Scientology first, and that will never happen either.
Okay, that's probably the stupidest thing you've posted yet. And the competition is fierce.
Where do you get the idea that when Q points us to those programs means that he "thinks those...code names are still current?"
You can do better than that. Your debunkery has been debunked.
Bagster
you're wrong
Oh so you’re merely a sheep brainwashed into believing your a lion, but in reality are just a goat leading the sheeple around for the real lions.. Other wise you wouldn’t have *shiver*-ed.
So can either of you refute the analysis in #319?
Do you accept it?
Or are you both as ignorant as Q?
Instead of insults and quips, try a few minutes of serious discussion and show us all what Q (y’all) can do.
US Navy 101, deployments of carrier battle groups according to Q, please begin:
We’re all waiting, breathlessly....
How long has “Q” been around?
Just wondering....
Still recovering, but I will bunk again soon.
That is no kind of explanation or argument.
Give your reasoning and evidence.
Are you really so mentally incompetent? You are embarrassing, not only yourself but the entire Q-cult.
Part of my mission, as assigned by Q (all blessings be upon him) is to "red-pill" the sleepers. So I am here to share my wisdom and the word of Q with the likes of you.
So, no. I will not stay in my little Q bubble. I will never cease attempting to unplug you from the matrix. Even you deserve the truth, despite yourself. You will thank me later.
Bagster
Wow, you are really pitiful beyond belief. I know that you thrive on your silly quips and adolescent rants, but are you really so incapable of analysis and intelligent argument?
Do you really get assignments from “Q”?
How long has “Q” been around?
What is “Q”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.