Bagster
'The Lesser Oracle
Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Bagster
'The Lesser Oracle
Bagster
'The Lesser Oracle'
Go read a book. Start with Clancy.
You folks following 4-chan are wild.
A Trump-supporting patriot who actually IS close to the POTUS speaks:
Joe DiGenova on Hannity: “Comey is dirty, Rosentein is compromised. Jeff Sessions has a duty to fire Rosenstein NOW... It’s HIS job, not Trump’s.”
Q speaks:
‘TRUST SESSIONS’
‘If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Why did Sessions pick RR?
Everyone has an opinion.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.’
See the difference?
DiGenova has Trump’s best interests at heart. Q has Rosenstein’s and Mueller’s best interests at heart.
Your post the other night about calling in Apaches helicopters for a strike gets Best Post of the entire thread, imho. I’ve never done anything remotely like that and I never will. I hope that’s not too upsetting to those who proved, with geometrical Q-logic, that I am you.
Apache
Mark Levin has some sage wisdom/keen insights to pass along to Q:
‘Mueller is trying to usurp the ENTIRE constitutional POWER of CONGRESS!’
Trump concurs:
“Because of the fact that they have this witch hunt going on with people in the Justice Department that shouldn’t be there, they have a witch hunt against the president of the United States going on, I’ve taken the position, and I don’t have to take this position and maybe I’ll change, that I will not be involved with the Justice Department. I will wait until this is over. It’s a total, it’s all lies and it’s a horrible thing that is going on, a horrible thing.”
http://truthfeednews.com/happening-now-trump-announces-his-next-move-in-russia-investigation/
A.) Geometric logic will not be mocked.
B.) I thought you didn't read my posts.
C.) Just because lo-iq posted about Apaches doesn't mean you aren't him. C,mon,man.
Bagster
The Lesser Oracle
Saw your screen name, read no further.
A note to some of the more hateful posters. If I were a non-Christian and I said x, y or z, I can understand people who would think I was only bluffing. But Christians have a different standard. We are told straight up that liars will have their place in the lake of fire. No, the Scripture is not exaggerating. God hates lies. The devil is the father of lies. If a Christian says something, they better mean it. Otherwise they will end up trying to explain to God on the Day of Judgment why they lied despite His harshest warnings.
One more thing. There are people who believe in Q who treat people who don’t believe in Q hatefully. For non-Christians this is natural. But for Christians it’s not an option:
Matthew 5:43-48
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. ...
1 John 4:20
If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for the one who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen.
[This, btw, points to something fundamentally amiss with the entire Q phenomenon. Namely, that it convinces Christians, counter to every command of Jesus, that it’s okay to treat people who don’t believe in Q hatefully (and/or to encourage others to treat non-Qers hatefully). Anything that causes us to violate the commands of Christ is a bad thing, period.
Matthew 18:9
If your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and throw it from you. It is better for you to enter life with one eye, than to have two eyes and be cast into the fiery hell.]
Well then, you better invest in asbestos pantaloons. Lying liar that lies. Liar McLiarpants.
Good to see you back to playing the victim card. I like whiny Fantifa much better than Pavlov's dog the troll mind controller Fantifa. Your tears are delicious and it's way more funnier.
Bagster
The Lesser Oracle
More on Mark Levin’s scathing analysis of Mueller’s true motives. This link includes video:
‘Make no mistake, America, the Russia witch-hunt has a purpose.
It’s not to get to the so-called “truth,” because if that was the case, Mueller would have shut down this sham probe eons ago.
As Mark Levin put it, during an appearance on Fox News, Mueller’s purpose is to REMOVE President Trump.’
one for the trolls
1339
May 11 2018 12:12:38 (EST)
Expand your thinking.
Why are we being attacked?
Why are we being attacked by people who claim to be PRO-POTUS?
Do we have a face?
Do we have a name?
Do we use platforms whereby we collect followers?
Selfless.
Zero vanity.
Why are we here?
Why do we ask questions?
The choice has always been yours.
Use logic.
Free information.
What draws people here?
Expanding exponentially?
They all claim to be insiders.
They all claim to have insider contacts.
They do not.
Patriots do NOT reveal classified information.
Why do we communicate this way?
Think for yourself.
Clickbait.
We are a threat to profiteering.
Information should flow freely w/o costs.
We established a series of ‘proofs’ for this specific reason.
Undeniable.
Unpredictable.
Coincidence after Coincidence.
Growth due to confirmations.
Real source(s) communicating w/ the people.
Unrestricted.
TOGETHER.
Control the information (THEY).
Harness followers / profiteering (THEY).
Define Media.
Primary goal of the Media?
To Sell (each selling a dif narrative - set of targets).
Selling makes money.
Be careful who you follow.
Define ‘Patriot’.
They want you DIVIDED.
Attacks will only get worse.
Q
Exaaaactly.
Bagster
The Lesser Oracle
Bagster, you’ve been playing with your food long enough. Call in a fire mission - zot’em.
No time for this stuff. You got better things to do.
The Bagster Alliance hard at work.
Bagster
The Lesser Oracle
You could politely debate the issues on a thread that is unconnected to the Friendly Collaboration series.
Or you could A, send obscene PMs, B, troll them to other threads, C, post 100s of nasty pics and ad hominem, D, try to get them banned.
Qers cannot politely debate anything. Qers also can’t tolerate the expression of non-Q orthodoxy. In that sense, they’re just like Muslims.
You can’t accept there is something more than smoke going on with the Q thing.
It’s a low bar. Some are following it, and seeing something in it. Some don’t.
Most people just want quiet enjoyment - let me get with like-minded folks and noodle through it.
You can’t. Don’t know why. Even though that’s the point of this forum.
So yes, an ozone enema is something you should end up with at the earliest possible opportunity.
You the Friendly Q Collaboration threads. You can have all the quiet enjoyment you want on them. I don’t post on those threads, ever.
Why is your devotion to Q such that you have to try to get me banned for posting on a NON-Collaboration thread? Is the quiet enjoyment you experience on the Collaboration threads ruined by your knowledge that someone, somewhere, doesn’t believe in Q?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.