Replies

$~~~THE BAGSTER SUN-TIMES/Q EDITION~~~$

The staff of the Sun-Times has been overwhelmed on this date. A flurry of activity and complicated posts have taxed the brain-pans of our small, but dedicated staff. The posts will be dealt with in a compact manner, so as to get this report out to press in a timely manner.

a.) Initially, there were a couple of troll sightings. Jack Black made an appearance to let us know how foolish we are for thinking we had superior knowledge and that EVERYBODY already know this Q stuff. We don't need Q to tell us. Jack Black seems very smart.

b.) The first Q wave hits. 1280-1284 talks about General Flynn, the National Security Advisor fired and indicted in the early days of Trump. Q tells us that "Flynn is safe" and implies that he is a tool to get his knowledge of "where the bodies are buried" into the legal system.

Q's mention of a "laser pointer" generates much discussion, which veers off into cat chat. Which is probably inevitable given the age group of FReeQ nation. Laser pointer was explained by Bagster early on as a distraction intended to get the "Democats" chasing something that really isn't there. I.E. Flynn, in this particular context.

c. ) 1285 talks about Mueller being on the White House "short list" for FBI director, despite the fact that he can't legally serve for more than a ten year term. Which he already did. So, either Trump is an idiot and didn't know that, or something else may be going on here. Pro tip: Trump is not an idiot.

d.) 1286 was a mile long post in mostly straightforward English, light on code. For best understanding, go read it yourself. Way too much to report here. I'll attempt a super condensed version.

More Mueller, Multiple "Trump not under investigatin" statements, including Mueller, Wikilieaks/Assange what are they up to? Why silent lately?

Can Mueller drop probe on Trump and still continue to function and investigate "other things?" Q seems to be saying that the Trump thing must continue to keep Mueller up and running. As if he IS working for the Trumpster. Mentions Sessions/IG/Huber. What powers do they have/recusal. Talks about impeachment. Flynn again, voter fraud, and google.

HRC insurance [win]...and then this, "SC targeting who? SC on team? SC off team? Questions reveal answers. Time will tell." Questions reveal answers. They way I answered the questions leads me to "Mueller is a white hat." The Bagster Sun-Times is not ready to endorse that theory just yet, but ears around the newsroom are perking up.

e.) 1287. Another marathon post. Q seems long winded or, in my opinion frustrated or disappointed in events as they are playing out. More on that later.

He mentions Stormy Daniels and the Cohen raid. He seems to be saying that it is ridiculous to assume that the FBI would raid the President's lawyer just for proof of a Stormy Daniels payoff. He hints that it may have been kabuki to insert other information into the legal system. He asks who has all the info. I assume that after the raid, Mueller does. More grist for the Mueller is a white hate theory?

And then Q mentions putting info from his drops out there for the world to see, including bad actors. So to cover his Mueller hints, he says, "Not confirming SC (Mueller) is on /team/." At the very least, Mueller is now suspect by his own people, if indeed he is a black hat. This is mental F'kery at it's best.

f.) 1288. Q now lists all the FBI figures that are either fired or cooperating witness with no power. Basically, the draining of the FBI swamp. He asks us to think about THAT.

g.)1289. Finally, a short one. And this is where the frustration begins to show. He's answering someone (an anon>) and says,"Peace on the Korean Peninsula isn’t big news? Should we drop a #MOAB on that? Timetables shift. [Next Week]."

Due to lack of a MOAB that the people expected, (FBI assassination plot), Q responds that the Korean peace is a damn fine MOAB. Historical, in fact. I consider it one, but apparently it didn't fit into the anons, or some of our, expectations. This is why, I think Q is going into great detail about the FBI, Mueller, and pretty much the whole plan. He is countering the disappointment.

My personal thought is that the "right people" have the information we are expecting, but that we haven't seen it yet. We, the public.

h.) 1290. Q responds to an anon who says "normies" who watch CNN don't know any of this. Q's frustration boils over and he compares CNN to CIA and talks about Russians grounding our planes in Syria and military planes crashing in U.S. Asks if Autists need red bull. They must be sleepy to miss those things. Wake up, autists.

I.) 1291. Last but not least. Another anon whine post. Just the fact that Q is posting these and answering them tells me the level of pissed off he is. He spent a lot of time and cyber ink explaining and defending himself tonight.

This anon whined about not being given "credit" for all his hard work and losing his job and friends. As if he ever had a job OR friends. Haha. Just kidding, nerd. Q responds by saying how do you make arrests with a crooked leadership at FBI. He says trust the plan. Efforts will pay off. In it together, blah blah blah. He didn't slap they pusscakes like he deserved. Are we here for credit or appreciation?

There is the basic difference between autists and the Q team, Military men, and older Americans like us FReeQS. We see that there are more important things than our individual selves. Things like country, culture, values, etc. That's why we do what we do. Younger people, like anons, have a shorter attention span and I feel are attracted to Q for the "game" and "puzzle solving" aspect. Yes, some of it is patriotism, but they may tend to become frustrated at the lack of "results" more quickly to older and wiser people.

I would caution some FReeQs and the general FReep population to take this as an example. Don't go wobbly. Stay the course. Never give up. Never surrender.

The last was editorial commentary from the Editor of the Bagster Sun-Times himself. He who is most awesome has spoken.

Until tomorrow, same Q time. Same Q channel.

Housekeeping note: I've never done a ping list. A couple people have asked that I ping them these dumb posts. I just decided to try to do that. But I forgot all but one name who asked. Please ask me again and I'll give pinging a shot. :)

a.) Initially, there were a couple of troll sightings.

I recall you two are troll hunters and found a great definition of internet trolls in Psychology Today.

In this month's issue of Personality and Individual Differences, a study was published(link is external) that confirms what we all suspected: Internet trolls are horrible people.

Let's start by getting our definitions straight: An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation. Often, in fact, it seems like there is no real purpose behind their comments except to upset everyone else involved. Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend to get a response.

What kind of person would do this? Some Canadian researchers decided to find out.

They conducted two online studies with over 1,200 people, giving personality tests to each subject along with a survey about their Internet commenting behavior. They were looking for evidence that linked trolling with the "Dark Tetrad" of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

"... the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of Internet Trolling) scores were so strong that it might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists." [emphasis added]

Trolls truly enjoy making you feel bad. To quote the authors once more (because this is a truly quotable article): "Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have fun ... and the Internet is their playground!"

The next time you encounter a troll online, remember:
1.These trolls are some truly difficult people.
2.It is your suffering that brings them pleasure, so the best thing you can do is ignore them.

So the motto is don't feed the trolls but perfectly acceptable to abuse them because they like it.

Ok, nice summary. Lends well to a concise bullet point presentation of Q posts.

But there's a concern brewing about who is 'White Hat', who is 'Black Hat'.

Heard for awhile that Mueller is a 'White Hat'. Um...No. He's a compromised skunk who will be whatever he needs to be given the situation.

Just yesterday saw a back and forth that COMEY is really, truly, by golly A WHITE HAT. Um ... No. Saw that on a chat board and also some speculations of it on FR. Oh, and that Rosenstein fellow, why he's a White Hat too. He better be, if he wants to save his hide.

The way it's going we're likely to hear next that Bill and Hillary are WHITE HATS.

So let's be smart about this. First, let's look at what Q is saying and then let's look at some history with historical examples.

Q posts --> "Not confirming SC is on /team/" where SC refers to Special Counsel which is Robert Mueller.

Q does this for one of two reasons or both. One, he doesn't want to throw his/her/their achieved credibility behind a potential viral internet post that Mueller is a White Hat. Second, Mueller was undoubtedly a swamp lizard and was so until recently, so the implication is that Mueller is 'transitioning' from Black Hat to White Hat status, and he's doing so because the Trump camp has the goods on him. We can dismiss that Mueller was from the beginning a White House-White Hat operative because 'he met with the President'. The President also met with Comey. The President has also donated to Democrats, dined with NYC mobsters, and beamed smiles before the cameras while standing close to Hillary Rotten. So it doesn't mean a thing.

Adding to Mueller's indictable Black Hat past is his Uranium One (U1) peddling of U sample specimens to the Russians and his backroom graft compensation through an invitation-only hedge fund investment in the Caymans where fellow globalist cabalist George Soros has based his Quantum Group that operates tax-haven trading floors similar in size to NY trading floors. And who extended this invitation-only opportunity? Why none other than powerful friends of the Clinton Crime machine, specifically one Lawrence Tribe.

https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/979172877835624459?lang=en

Now a few points from history as to what we might be witnessing. We are indeed witnessing a sort of American version of a Velvet Revolution. In that revolution as well as similar revolutions of the time, there were many witness accounts of former KGB who were professing profusely that they never were part of the plan to persecute, never willingly acting as communist state enforcers, that they were always siding with the resistance and helping where they could. In other words, they were always White Hats masquerading on the inside as Black Hats.

Picture a couple of KGB agents in a room with a fellow that had married a foreigner for money that he needed to purchase a working van to replace his broken one. The foreigner coming from East Germany needed Czech visa papers which she paid for with money and acquired via the marriage so that she could continue with a plan to escape to the West. The KGB was on to her but not fast enough, so they brought in the 'husband' and beat him to an inch of his life to get him to confess. A confession would mean a certain death so the beatings continued turning him into a bloody mess. At the precise moment that he was nearly dead, there was a huge clamoring of noises on the city streets outside the building where the KGB had detained this fellow. The KGB ran out to the street to see what it was and saw it was the Velvet Revolution unfolding with massive numbers of people cheering and celebrating the news that the communist regime was removed from power. Ding Dong the Evil Witch was Dead!

Now get this because this is the point. The victim left inside the building had friends outside who could not rescue him while the KGB were beating him. They had to lay low. When they saw the KGB exit the building into the massive crowds that had gathered, they were no longer afraid and they wanted to capture the KGB and beat them up right there in the street just as the KGB had beaten their friend inside. But the KGB smiled and said "You got it all wrong! We were never for Communism! We were always one of you working on the inside!".

The above is a true story. There are countless such stories.

Pasternak, when he wrote Zhivago, wove dozens of true real-life observations into his masterpiece. If you don't have time to read the novel and you are a serious student or consumer of human character studies, see the Zhivago film version produced by UK's Granada Television, with co-funding from the American producers at WGBH Boston. Do not bother with the Hollywood version as it's not really faithful to the essence of Pasternak's epic story. Pasternak develops a character named Viktor Komarovsky, a self-serving man with grotesque principles that are common among pathogens of elite society. He rapes the teenage daughter of a lady he is dating and calls her a slut, a whore. And he is so polished and well-dressed, impeccable manners in public, familiar with all the social graces. He looks distinguished. He maintains friends on both sides during the revolution and manages to get a good post in the new government even though he doesn't believe in Communist ideals. He is truly a Black Hat that poses as a 'White Hat' whenever it is convenient for him. He's a chameleon who blends into whatever background there is, always escaping justice and coming out on top.

Mueller is an American Komarovsky.

Роберт Muellerovsky

No one is saying Mueller rapes women but he's been a member of a cabal with members who do.

The nature of the DOJ/FBI upper echelon that Mueller has carved out a role in is one that has been culturally redirected (see Youtubes of Robyn Gritz) from a top management whose prime directive was protecting the American people to one of protecting the elite and ultimately the global elite with their CIA counterparts forming a praetorian guard around globalist bankers (because that's where the money is, so saith Willie Sutton).

The Hillary ethos pervading the world of Mueller is one of "I'M WITH HER!" (the anointed global elite) whereas the one that is alien to Mueller is Trump's "I'M WITH YOU!" (the American people). To think that Mueller was a White Hat at the beginning of his 'probe' is ludicrous. He's just a beaten cabal member who Rudy will take down and maybe, just maybe allow Muellerovsky to escape justice by spinning a yarn about how the Special Counsel did the right thing in furnishing evidence of deep state treachery. Bob better be a good boy or else.

I'll be watching for more BlackHats to suddenly submit applications to be White Hats as the deep state war winds down.