Skip to comments.
State appeals court rules Texas' "revenge porn" law violates the First Amendment
The Texas Tribune ^
| 4/19/2018
| Emma Platoff
Posted on 04/23/2018 8:03:31 AM PDT by ken in texas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: Ancesthntr
Those 2 things - property rights and the right to privacy - should overcome free speech issues...I'm inclined to agree. Unfortunately, considering how large the penumbra of the Constitution has grown, there's no telling what whould end up being permissible or not. ;-)
To: rednesss
“I believe both of those issues should be reserved for civil court where you can sue somebody for those infractions.”
Do you understand that the Internet is forever, that once something like this is done, it cannot be reversed? I’M HOME, this is such an egregious violation of your property and privacy rights that it should be criminal to violate them. I would specifically leave a means in the law to allow for a judicial finding that it is fine to do in specific, limited circumstances (like, for instance, someone who signed a release for artistic purposes, or someone who was a stripper and had already basically given up the right to object).
22
posted on
04/23/2018 11:58:34 AM PDT
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: Ancesthntr; rednesss
I’m home should be “IMHO”
23
posted on
04/23/2018 12:00:05 PM PDT
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson