Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
Speaking of personalities, yours does not do well with mine.
For the most part I’m the logical, serious, abstract thinker with slight paranoid tendencies. You come across as the emotional, histrionic attention seeker whose narcissistic temperament sets your retaliatory impulse on a hair trigger. Hence your post #1513.
We don’t do well because your need for attention confuses me, at times setting off my paranoia, and things go downhill from there.
All I can think of is I was touched that you sent me a private email.
Indeed!
Rush must have been teasing. I am sure at least one of his researchers had to have mentioned Q to him by now.
I was listening to that. Rush’s “I don’t no nuthin’” attitude about Q Anon is a front. A couple weeks ago a caller brought it up, and he said then that he’d never heard of it. So maybe he doesn’t know a lot about it, but he HAS heard of it.
I think there are two different justifications involved, and each justification feeds a different argument or theory.
Some are of a mind that the Page/Strzok love affair is pure fiction, and as the sole point of evidence, they cite a total absence of lovey messages. That observation is also explained if the DOJ withheld all the purely personal messages.
Of the messages that are not withheld, there are likely portions redacted at least from the public. I would take those as protecting either classified information or ongoing investigations.
Q anecdote time and relevantly on topic. Surprise: So my good son is 25 and for some reason listens to the conservative channel here, Rush, Hannity, etc. I turned him on to Drudge for starter material and it pings to his phone with breaking stuff.
I tried Q on him and I guess I mistakenly gave him the kookoobird version cause he laughed at me. ME! Me who made him. I want him to hear Rush say Q just one time while he's listening. This could possibly be the keystone to unlocking the entire mellenial generation and bringing them over to us. He has a lot of friends. He really does.
Seriously. Rush and Roseanne. That's mainstream, people. Well, Roseanne anyway. More and More. Q will be on every lip. We must increase our efforts. I red pilled a guy yesterday that was over selling me a patio. Probably in his thirties or late twenties.
Fresno is mine, and soon the entire central valley. California will fall. Then up the coast to the other hippie states. Together we move west and meet you guys in the middle.
Saddle up sidewinders!!!!
For tonight...WE RIDE!!!!!!!
Nap time.
On reading that, I wonder if you are thinking of the 50,000 that were missing. Cough cough.
Wish they would hurry up and make some high profile arrests so we could stop eating our own.
I’m pretty sure Florida voter registration data by county/party is somewhere on line. I’ve bumped into it when looking up old friends who moved to FL. Ages are usually there, too. Just put in the name (middle or middle initial helps)and whatever address you have, even if it’s only county/state. You might even see the relevant data on the search return page.
Or another 50 million corlordes. :)
Bright side. Another 50 million ME's!!!!
Yea. Yea. Missing. Thanks, Miss Manners. :)
Nap well, napster,.... err, Bagster.
Night shift is soon upon us.
He's gonna do what he's gonna do.
His program is influential. But he is quite careful about not stepping directly on deep state toes. He'll play according to the templates advanced by the press, for the most part. There is TONS of room for dissent in that playground.
Limbaugh never got down in the weeds on OKC, Waco, Ruby Ridge, or a host of toher events where it is pretty clear the government was "dealing dirty," to put it mildly.
I figure he'll do a sort of admit it (Q) is there, but is in the nature of a LARP - in his own words, of course. Acknowledge, but try to discourage serious interest.
Thanks for your very touching encouragement. Rather needed today. I find you rather likeable, too. Thanks for being here and for being you.
Speaking of FBI (I was looking for a post to spring off of):
I caught bits of Hannity’s radio show in the first hour. Didn’t catch who he was speaking with, since I was vacuuming, but the person stated that “Past predicts future” is an element in FBI criminal training (& perhaps Military Intelligence/Military Police?). Means a person’s past will give good indications about what future acts they will commit.
Sorry if I’m the last person to find this out, but I’ve never seen it spelled out this way before.
I say hold on a sec. I have engaged in a workplace romance, even bedded and wedded one. Once the sexual harassment phase had advanced to the boning phase, we became secretive, and we weren't even married to other people. A workplace affair is usually not talked about openly in a law enforcement environment, even more so when one or both of the parties are married.
I put it to you that they took great care not to show attention to each other at work, like me and my ex did. And they, being FBI, knew better than to act like dipshits on their company phones or at work. Maybe they kept personal phones for that, or maybe they kept it in their pantaloons at work. Most likely both.
So I do not disregard the affair's existence. Somebody got the info from somewhere. Unless it was totally made up out of nothing for the purposes some have stated.
I don't even know why it's so important to know if they were having an affair other than to show the closeness of their relationship for some reason or to embarrass them.
That's my rant on the subject. Other rants may differ.
--a {can't think of those Starwars short teddy-bear type people};
--gollum;
--a whirling dervish;
and an
--ADHD plagued kangaroo
with a dash of Machiavelli thrown in for some obnoxiously fiesty spice.
Nah. He’s just having’ fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.