Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
Me thinks Mike Wallace is behind there somewhere ... I remember when Ted Koppel gave that testimony to Arlen Specter. Stansfield Turner died last month.
intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf/http
Look at me. I made hotlinks out of Q's links. :)
Forty’s a lot of journalists back then. Wallace was surely in that pack.
My own conjecture is that Tony is in Gitmo. And John is running around loose so they can observe all the folks he sees and communicates with and how much the next tiers are implicated thereby.
And, there's some intel that John is not doing well physically, at all--whatever that means.
BTW, I've just received intel that one of your hyper-naysaying cohorts was repeatedly thoroughly !WRONG! in his conjectures about the pre-election period and who would run, win etc. He bet against Trump repeatedly. He was !WRONG! repeatedly. So much for that whining naysayer who pretends to be sooooooo !FULL! of pretend logical, erudite wisdom about Q-Anon.
However, we Q-Anon fans appreciate such a brazen string of being horribly wrong about Trump and various other election factoids. It provides us with a bit of humor to contrast that record with the bloke's raging pontifications as though he is omniscient and thoroughly accurate in his blathering spews about Q-Anon.
His gross and horrendous lack of personal insight is a real trip, too. Must make him a real honey to be married to. And if he has teens--oh, Dear me. Round and round they must go.
My own conjecture is that Tony is in Gitmo. And John is running around loose so they can observe all the folks he sees and communicates with and how much the next tiers are implicated thereby.
And, there's some intel that John is not doing well physically, at all--whatever that means.
BTW, I've just received intel that one of your hyper-naysaying cohorts was repeatedly thoroughly !WRONG! in his conjectures about the pre-election period and who would run, win etc. He bet against Trump repeatedly. He was !WRONG! repeatedly. So much for that whining naysayer who pretends to be sooooooo !FULL! of pretend logical, erudite wisdom about Q-Anon.
However, we Q-Anon fans appreciate such a brazen string of being horribly wrong about Trump and various other election factoids. It provides us with a bit of humor to contrast that record with the bloke's raging pontifications as though he is omniscient and thoroughly accurate in his blathering spews about Q-Anon.
His gross and horrendous lack of personal insight is a real trip, too. Must make him a real honey to be married to. And if he has teens--oh, Dear me. Round and round they must go.
Usually, it's just a biased slam.
vs what was and is ... have been rather different things.
Sleep well!
Tee hee.
Walter Cronkite was also complicit.
Thanks, mom. :)
I'm going to have to experiment with that; I thought the percentage was percentage of pane width -- not of original image size.
I wonder who the clergymen hired by the CIA were? And what were they tasked to do. Simply to sway public opinion?
Cool beans! :)
I like Dilley, been listening to him a few weeks now on youtube, not seen him lately, did he get banned too? Just looked where District 8 was today, North and West of me. I have a bunch of friends there and my son & daughter-in-law too. They have two girls in school plus sports, so around lots of other parents... Need to spread the word, He needs to win!
I have been all over reddit tonight, so could not come up with a link, but somewhere read a claim that when they upped the publicly released info from 20/80 to 40/60 it was also decided that when this was over, Trump would also publicly confirm Q was the reason this worked, to be able to inform the public what was happening as a necessity.
Think about it, it could not work without us, that is why the timeline is determined by the true groundswell, The percentage of us that knows the truth, reaching the proper level is a primary part of the board being set right for the CHECK MATE! If not, we would have a civil war when left felt like Trump was locking up literally everybody that spoke out against him, same reason it has to come from Justice Department. 13,600 sealed indictments so far, could be more than one person on each or one person could be name in more than one, so more or less than 13,600 is about the only question.
Maybe that was that on Dilley’s notes? I read them all tonight, Thanks for those!
(Post #70 for those who dont know)
Q Ping
Two new drops. I will split the ping list in two and post each half separately to see if that resolves problem with people missing pings.
Q drop #802
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts?page=494#494
Q drop #803
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts?page=495#495
Thank you to all FReepers who post the drops and provide me with PMs to let me know when they arrive. Its so uplifting to see the prayers rising from FR for our POTUS and our country - please continue. Also, please continue to pray against our enemies, false flags, civil unrest and all other disruptors.
If you have not done so already, please consider donating to FR to help keep the lights on. ThanQ.
Q Ping
Two new drops. I will split the ping list in two and post each half separately to see if that resolves problem with people missing pings.
Q drop #802
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts?page=494#494
Q drop #803
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts?page=495#495
Thank you to all FReepers who post the drops and provide me with PMs to let me know when they arrive. Its so uplifting to see the prayers rising from FR for our POTUS and our country - please continue. Also, please continue to pray against our enemies, false flags, civil unrest and all other disruptors.
If you have not done so already, please consider donating to FR to help keep the lights on. ThanQ.
thestoryofq.com ^
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.