If you can't deal with people not sharing your opinion, don't ping them.
Posted on 02/19/2018 6:11:20 PM PST by Rio
Striking resemblance to Fidel also. g
I believe you can be certain that the royal family has had DNA tests done, given the rumors, since for years until George and Charlotte were born, Harry was fourth in line to the throne. If something happened to Charles and William, there is every likelihood that Harry would be appointed Regent until the George was of age.
If Harry were not theirs, the Windsors would not be treating him half as well—they stripped Diana of her title at the divorce; if he were a bastard, they would not be letting him have a big wedding with all the trappings.
Several years ago Charles, to cut expenses, sidelined his own brothers Andrew and Edward, and his nieces and nephews by them including Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, cutting back all of their allotments from the privy purse and not including them on the balcony for many occasions. He is so emotional and loony, there is no way he would be able to fake it if Harry weren’t his.
Think about it.
I think, if one of the most famous men in the world had been cuckolded, he’d try and ignore it.
There’s no way he could actually do anything about it anyway.
What could he say?
It's not very likely that their paths did cross.
Margaret Sinclair and Pierre Trudeau were married in March, 1971 and Justin Trudeau was born in November 1971.
I doubt she would have had time to fit a tryst with Fidel into her schedule.
Maybe she was thinking of Fidel when Justin was conceived, but it's highly unlikely that they got together to produce a child in 1971.
You are like a dog with a rag. There are loads of things he could and would do, as I have just outlined. He could strip Harry of position, money and title. He could sideline him as he did his own brothers, and his ex-wife, even though she was the mother of the next king after him. The entire monarchy depends on blood relations, and the crown passes from blood to blood. Once Diana was stripped out, he could not take a chance of having Harry on the throne and some tabloid reporter picking up Harry’s glass at a reception and having it DNA tested against Hewitt. Don’t be silly. Palaces are full of intrigue. They could not and would not leave this stone unturned.
Keep the insults and discuss it like an adult or hop off.
Oh, brother.
Look, I don’t insult you or call you names. I don’t make rude posts to you just because we may disagree.
You can do the same, I’m sure.
I have endeavored to explain why your insistence on slandering a public figure, one who has already suffered tragedy, is logically inaccurate. I might add it is also offensive. You think “silly” is an insult, yet you have been calling this young man a bastard on the public forum. Seen and noted.
And with that, I conclude my conversation with you.
If you can't deal with people not sharing your opinion, don't ping them.
You’re entitled to your own opinion; but you’re not entitlled to your own facts. You have asserted not a single objective piece of evidence to support your entirely subjective opinion. I have asserted many facts, and they speak for themselves, as does your fact-free opinion.
You don’t have any facts. You just have an opinion, same as everyone else.
What you also don’t have is the adult-like ability to discuss an issue without resorting to petty insults.
• Diana did not meet Hewitt until after Harry was born, a fact you can research easily
• Diana was stripped of her titles at the divorce, a fact you can research easily
• Charles cut back his own brothers, nieces and nephews' allowances and reduced their participation in Court activities, facts you can research easily
• The hereditary monarchy operates on bloodlines; the bastard child of a divorced consort is not eligible to take the throne, facts you can research easily.
From these FACTS, I stated these logical conclusions based on facts:
• that the royals would already have made sure of Harry's parentage because of Harry's place in the line of succession;
• that Charles would not hesitate to reduce the public role of an illegitimate heir since he reduced the role of other legitmate heirs to the throne, and
• that if the royal family did not obtain DNA proof, someone else would have done it by stealth.
May I add that when the rumors were circulating, it would have been the duty of the Prime Minister to discuss the matter with the Queen and make sure she was certain of the line of succession. That's just common sense.
The fact that he and Harry look almost identical is the proof I need to suspect that Charles was cuckolded.
And the fact that he offload some freeloaders in his family speaks to nothing except he offload some freeloaders. Conclusions about Harry’s parentage can’t be drawn from that.
In fact, the only fact we have to go on is what we see with our own eyes. You draw your conclusions, I’ll draw mine.
Okay, it would have been very hard for Margaret, the new toast-of-the-town First Lady, and a May-December bride to boot, to go anywhere without being followed by the paparazzi, especially just after moving in with the PM.
Perhaps the UK's "gay" facial recognition software could be adapted to those with autocratic socialistic tendencies, given the Trudeaus' and Castro's similar facial features?
You were too afraid to examine and compare as I recommended amd to post their faces straight on, and observe the marked difference between Harry and Hewitt (and the similarity to Charles) in the proportions of eyes, nose, face length, the entire skull structure. No, just keep posting that one cheap shot tabloid montage over and over and over and over and over about a man who did not ask to be in public life. Classy!
Why can’t you discuss anything without hurling insults?
I’m not afraid, why would something like that even come out of your mouth?
Harry, he seems a nice enough chap, after he got past his Nazi phase.
He didn’t ask to be born to the mess he was born into, but who among us does?
For me, it just is what it is. He looks like his mother’s long term lover.
I’m not for him or against him because of that.
Well, as we all know, Cuba is an absolute bastion of truth and openness, and there's no way possible for Fidel Castro to have impregnated Margaret Trudeau outside of Cuba, his junk just didn't work anywhere else.
I’ll pray for you.
I sincerely hope you do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
