Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Russians lost their own 2nd Amendment: The right to bear arms
Russia Beyond ^ | 11/28/17 | Nikolay Shevchenko

Posted on 11/29/2017 7:42:35 AM PST by Simon Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: piytar

Some PCP air rifle can throw a 100+ grain slug at almost 1000 fps, people successfully (and legally in some states) hunt deer with them.


21 posted on 11/29/2017 8:52:59 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnyBoy

“The supreme court just let stand a ruling that all military like weapons can ban banned by a state.”


1. I think that the Supreme Court didn’t take the case because the result - given 4 very Leftist justices and the very blackmailable Roberts - was uncertain. What till Ginsburg croaks and Kennedy leaves, and this will be resolved the right way.

Besides,

2. Let’s see them actually ban them. There are 400 million guns in this country, and tens of billions of rounds of ammo. Good luck with that.


22 posted on 11/29/2017 9:10:02 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

>2. Let’s see them actually ban them. There are 400 million guns in this country, and tens of billions of rounds of ammo. Good luck with that.

The Commies in Russia pulled it off. Make no mistake, we’ve had 20-30 years of pure Marxist education of young kids in this country along with importing another 50 million outsiders. Things could get very nasty.


23 posted on 11/29/2017 9:21:23 AM PST by JohnyBoy (The GOP Senate is intentionally trying to lose the majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JohnyBoy

Millenials, for all their stupidity, poll consistently against gun control.


24 posted on 11/29/2017 9:48:43 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JohnyBoy

Thanks.


25 posted on 11/29/2017 10:34:56 AM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JohnyBoy

“The Commies in Russia pulled it off. Make no mistake, we’ve had 20-30 years of pure Marxist education of young kids in this country along with importing another 50 million outsiders.”


I’m well aware of that - since my father’s side of the family is from there. The key differences are: 1) We have a LOT of history of civilians owning arms; 2) We have the benefit of having seen what can happen to a disarmed populace (in Russia, Germany, China, Cambodia, Rwanda, etc.); and 3) We have a LOT more guns per capita than Russia ever did.

“Things could get very nasty.”


Oh, yes, they could and likely will. But so long as the side that wants to ban guns understands that the nastiness won’t be all in one direction, and that NO target is off-limits, then we won’t have to find out exactly how nasty things could get. I’m betting on at least 10,000 highly-skilled and well-equipped operators going after government officials, media types and academics - AND THEIR FAMILIES - if such festivities ever get started. There is literally no force on Earth that can stop more than a tiny fraction of those people before they really impact the “debate” over the wisdom of confiscation. Oh, and those 10,000 will have 1 million or more who will be glad to hide them, feed them, get them information, equip them, etc.


26 posted on 11/29/2017 1:46:55 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

I suspect you are right.


27 posted on 11/29/2017 3:46:25 PM PST by Bodega (we are developing less and less common sense...world wide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

‘’’’It was only a matter of time before Russia became an almost totally gun-free nation. Some people believed Russians would regain their right to own guns after the collapse of the Soviet Union but despite firearms becoming available on the black market during the 90s, the new government did not risk liberalizing the gun market.

Today, Russians can only legally buy smoothbore guns for hunting and sports, as well as pneumatic firearms for self-defense. Applying for a gun license also involves a pretty rigorous background check.’’’’

That’s basically not true. Since August 1953 you could buy any shotgun including semi-auto or a 22 caliber rifle without producing an ID in USSR. Guns were in abundance, you could by one in any hardware or sports shop. For a rifled gun you had to produce an ID and a hunting club membership.
At the same tume ‘respectable’ citizens could carry handguns under licence from local police chief.

More important, illegal weapon traffic was a federal crime in USSR butbthe maximal punishment was 2 years exile. That means the usual punishment was a fine or a month of probation.

Around 1959 there were changes and one was required to produce ID and a hunting club membership to buy any gun.

Actual gun registration started in 1974 and it required too much formalities specifically for a rifled gun owners prompting many to surrender it.

In fact the most dranonian anti-gun rules in modern Russia were implemented post-USSR in 1993 by Yeltsyn government. Handguns and rifles were nearly outlawed and for shotguns you were required to get a licence with months of background checks and other paperwork. To make things worse you had to renew the licence once in a few years.

Today the process is somehow easier and you can have rifle as well although many restriction remains.


28 posted on 11/29/2017 6:32:13 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MTsumi
The article is mostly a pile of bull crap surprisingly written by a Russian. It is exploiting myths about Russian gun rights circulating in the West. An author should have strated with visiting a gun shop for better research.
29 posted on 11/29/2017 6:39:09 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

In fact not. In 1906 they introduced licensing for firearms and since 1914 firearms circulation in most provinces was nearly total illegal.


30 posted on 11/29/2017 6:52:57 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

Search youtube for “russian dash cam”. Hours of fun.

Here is one of the collections - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIgjGEo1-QA


31 posted on 11/30/2017 12:20:03 AM PST by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
While I agree on many issues this is not completely true:

In fact the most dranonian anti-gun rules in modern Russia were implemented post-USSR in 1993 by Yeltsyn government.

The Yeltsyn's era bill on guns made rifles available to non-professional hunters. Handguns have been effectively banned since long ago at the Soviet era and the law changed nothing in that.

32 posted on 11/30/2017 2:51:29 AM PST by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior

What’s a definition of a ‘professional hunter’? You could get such a status from a related organizations rather easily. Also, before 1993 handgun permits were issued by a local police. Most holders were party apparatchiks, military vets who got personal handguns as an award or people working with cash and valuables, true but you still could get one being a friend with a police chief. In 1993 local police was stripped from the right to issue handgun permits which fell under a definition of a ‘service weapon’. Only government and security companies were allowed to hold handguns since then. The latter was actually a possibility to put hands on a handgun being licensed as a security guard. Another downside of a 1993 bill was that 22 lr was finally equated to the rest of rifled guns making it out of reach with a regular license.
Bottom line is USSR was rather pro-gun in between 1953 and 1974. Not entirely anti-gun in between 1974-1993. Currently there are certain improvements as well due to a loose legal definition of a ‘rifle’. There are certain types of rifling considered ‘smoothbore’ by law and producers are using it to build rather potent civilian weapons. ,366tkm or 9,6/53 lankaster calibers are good examples. The first is very accurate under 600ft and no less lethal than 7,62/39 and the latter is ever better than that. The main ussie is a cost because ,366tkm SKS cost like 30000 rubles or $500 while never-issued mind original SKS is around $100 and a used one is half that much. Also tkm ammo costs about $,5 per round and 7,62/39 is nearly free in Russia.


33 posted on 11/30/2017 11:02:15 AM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
What’s a definition of a ‘professional hunter’? You could get such a status from a related organizations rather easily.

In the late Soviet years (two decadish) it meant a person worked on a contract with a relevant enterprise. They hunted mainly for furs. Such job required living in a remote forested area for a half a year, and a rifle was necessary for self-defense.

but you still could get one being a friend with a police chief

That's not actually handgun ownership for everyone.

There are certain types of rifling considered ‘smoothbore’ by law and producers are using it to build rather potent civilian weapons.

Those solutions aren't popular at all. Most people prefer to wait for five years before they can legally apply for a rifle permit.

As for the handguns ownership, there have been at least two attempts to legalise it, the most recent was by the LDPR party, but the Russian Duma (parliament) has declined them all.

34 posted on 12/04/2017 7:55:57 AM PST by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson