How stupid is Levin? It was a comment part in jest and part serious.
Send Levin a memo; Get a life.
Levin is a never-Trumper loser. As for the so called “phony, so-called nationalist-populist movement”, nothing is more phony than globalist-corporate fake conservatives. Globalism is against everything the founders of this country fought and died for, and is not “conservative”.
I’d rather have dinner with Bernie Sanders than Mark Levin.
How ‘bout we whittle down Fedzilla to its rightful size and scope THEN worry about free trade...or not.
Let’s see what a TRUE Free Market would accomplish. No welfare (of *any* kind), rules\regs vs. TRUE fraud/damage, lower taxes all around, etc.
Levin is a total moron to me, at this point.
He obviously doesn’t give a damn about our treasured Constitution that he supposedly espouses allegiance and, therefore, the overall future of our country.
It’s a shame that some of Ted Cruz’ class and sensibility cannot rub off on this buffoon. Ted was so amazing at CPAC, yet his buddy Mark just sat alongside like a bump on a log.
I think Mark has issues. Trump was just throwing Bernie a bone.
So who is still listening to Beck and Levin at this point? What kind of ratings are they getting?
Is Levin so stupid as to think that Trump was exalting Sanders? Or actually praising Sanders? He can’t be.
Trump and Bernie are right.
Why?
A truly free market economy cannot mount the same government-system gifts to its domestic industries as is bestowed on the Chinese mainland businesses in China by the mecantilist nationalist system run by the dictatorship there. Additionally, a much larger percentage of mainland China companies than most people understand are NOT “private” companies in a United States sense, but are state owned, private-share selling (NOT for any voting control, merely for raising capital) companies and subsidiaries of companies that are state owned, or fully controlled by the state as far as its board and/or principle officers or “shareholders”, or controlled by the Communist Party of China through the party members in control of the company and/or its “shares”. The STATE marshals everything in favor of its companies, including the funds given to its companies to go acquire assets and businesses around the world. If either the Dims or the GOP sought to conduct “business” in the nationalist manner as China does, there would be a revolution here again. So, why do we think “free trade” applies to trade with China? It doesn’t.
Sorry Mark Levin, Trump and Sanders are right.
Rather than targeting China merely because it is China, we could adopt trade rules that say we do not conduct business in the U.S. with any foreign “state enterprise” and in that law define “state enterprise” down to all the ways the dictatorship in China puts the state control into enterprises there.