Posted on 11/26/2016 8:21:49 AM PST by BenLurkin
Laz,
You are missing the point.
It is not about what is technologically possible.
The risk averse policies, drive design requirements that make the end objective financially unachievable.
When we can attain the same results with robots for 10% of the cost, you can’t justify sending man.
What are the theoretical benefits of sending man to Mars?
Real estate.
Real Estate is fake when it can’t sustain life.
This earth can easily sustain 4 times the current population once the Population Control crowd is unmasked.
The eugenics crowd don’t want third world populations competing for their own resources.
At the same time the “first” world is aborting and contracepting themselves out of existence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.