"Sometimes I get them menstrual cramps real hard."
I hope they put those little tampon boxes in the boys restrooms. Tampons make a nice soft missile to throw at pussies when they are being pussies.
Honestly though, if they do put tampon dispensers in boys bathrooms 99.99% will be used for other purposes than intended.
This is just dumb lefties tilting at windmills until they get so frustrated they start killing the people that will not comply. That is when rational people start coming to the conlussion that leftists need to be put down like dogs.
The Obama transformation of America. With his Islamicst mass invasion of USA. Where to escape? U.K. Canada and much of Europe are being sold out to the enemy, too. Plus they’re being taught all this sicko sex stuff too
Thank the twisted, sociopathic, Muslim-loving fruitcake that uses the oval office toilet for his attending to his feminine needs.
AJ should just shove his tampon where the sun doesn’t shine.
They need to start giving grades for the bathroom.
16 or not, this guy should be ridiculed mercilessly for the good of society.
There is a reason that, historically, society has given those who veer too far away from societal norms a hard time: it maintained a coherent society.
The mantra today is we to applaud those who go over the edge. The goal is to eliminate societal order.
So AJ is actually a girl named Autumn.
This is a mental problem
Evidentiary question: Where was he bleeding from? His ass? That would be a poor excuse for a period. But, with the gender fluid, who knows?
Don’t worry, every mens room in the US will soon have Tampon dispensers and disposal units very very soon.
He could stick it in his ear......or ??
Compared to this, the guy in an earlier story who lived as a goat seems totally sane.
He is a she. It still has the regular girl plumbing.
Ok, fine. Now, show us your tits.
From the nyt article
But the way some of his classmates see it, A J was still Autumn Jackson, a girl in boys’ clothing, who had violated an intimate sanctum, while two boys were standing at a urinal, their private parts exposed.
“It’s like me going into a girls’ bathroom wearing a wig,” Tanner Bischofberger, 15, a classmate of A J Jackson’s, who was not one of those in the bathroom, said this week. “It’s just weird.”
She IS mentally ill. She’s a girl playing boy, so she really is menstruating.
But using the boys bathroom is becoming inconvenient during her time of the month.
This is all so sick!
BTW, the persons name is Autumn. The person is female.
"Sometimes I get them menstrual cramps real hard."
[ Homeschool your kids, if nothing more than to keep them from these mentally ill ones. ]
But if you dare suggest that one of these Parents of these “Transgendered Teens” home-school THEIR special snowflake, they will call YOU a hater.
Case in point:
If I ever have a child who is genuinely gender confused (assuming it was some sorta genetic issue with like XXY or XX-XY mosaic genetic issue or a SRY mutation causing them gender issues, which is really really really rare and not just a purely mental condition).
I sure as hell would HOMESCHOOL them instead of sending them off to Public School and try to force everyone else in the school to submit to the “Deviation the Norm” to steal some terms from Statistics. This is why:
1. I wouldn’t trust the Liberals at the school to not try to shoe-horn my child into one of the various LGBTQXYZ groups and make them feel like a victim or a special snowflake that would ruin their natural sense of merit.
2. It would minimize all the restroom issues, because at home there is only ONE BATHROOM, especially if my child had a physical abnormality in their “parts” caused by the genetic condition.
3. I would be able to closer monitor my child and work to council then through whatever choice they decided to make without the peer-pressure that could incorrectly influence their decision, one which they would regret deeply later.
But why do liberals and progressives want to make the schools bend to the will of all this craziness, instead of taking personal responsibility for their “gender confused kids”?
Well, the liberal mindset is such that since government is supposed to be a parent, that they think government schools must be the sorta of parent that they themselves WANTED, and never the sort of parent that they NEEDED! Because they are spoiled rotten morons with only a basic kindergarten frame of mind to how they think the world is “Supposed” to work, while ignoring nature and reality. This makes them want to justify their iron fisted control of other people “for their own good”...
What do I mean by this? On the pivotal Fascist use of these seemingly trivial "pronoun games", check out sociologist Peter Berger, who said:
"My mother was from Italy and my father was Austrian. As a child I spent a lot of time in Italy. This was in the 1930s, when Italy was of course under Mussolini. Sometime during that period, I forget which year it was, Mussolini made a speech in which he called for a reform of the Italian language.
In modern Italian - - as in most Western languages, with the interesting exception of English -- there are two forms of address, depending on whether you are talking to an intimate or to a stranger. For example, "tu" and "usted" are used in Spanish. In modern Italian "tu" is the intimate form of address, "lei" is the formal address. "Lei" happens to be the third person [feminine singular].
I do not know the history of this, but it has been a pattern of modern Italian for, I would imagine, some two hundred years. No one paid any attention to this. Even as a child, I knew what one said in Italian. It meant nothing.
"But Mussolini made a speech in which he said that the use of "lei" is a sign of effeminacy, a degenerate way of speaking Italian. Since the purpose of the Fascist Revolution was to restore Roman virility to the Italian people, the good Fascist did not say "lei"; the good Fascist said "voi" -- from the Latin "vos" -- which is the second person plural. From that point on, everyone who used "lei" or "voi" was conscious of being engaged in a political act.
"Now, in terms of the empirical facts of the Italian language, what Mussolini said was nonsense. But the effect of that speech meant an awful lot, and it was intended to mean an awful lot. Because from that moment on, every time you said "lei" in Italy you were making an anti-Fascist gesture, consciously or uncon sciously -- and people made you conscious of it if you weren't --- and every time you said "voi" you were making the linguistic equivalent of the Fascist salute.
"The "funny feeling" which we associate with generic "man" and with other instances of inclusive language is the same twinge of uneasiness that second- person "lei" would have prompted in Fascist Italy. The feeling is not a natural response but a conditioned response to the stimulus. We feel it because we have been coached to feel it. We feel it because, like rats repeatedly given a jolt of electric current when they move in a particular way, we have become aware of potential unpleasantness accompanying certain behavior. That is how a taboo works.
The Italian who used stigmatized risked Fascist anger; the English speaker who uses stigmatized "man" risks feminist wrath, but the phenomenon is identical. The converse is also applicable. As Berger says, the accommodationist Italian who said voi was giving the equivalent of a fascist salute. The accommodationist in our time who uses "inclusive language" is making a little genuflection, a curtsy, in the direction of feminism.
An insight on PC language. Every time you open your mouth, it makes you bow, or face the consquences.
Quoted from a longer, and excellent article by Paul Mancuso on so-called "inclusive language".