Posted on 05/09/2016 12:02:39 PM PDT by minimum12
Using a personal email account and private server constitute GROSS NEGLIGENCE and CRIMINAL WILLFUL INTENT to break the law.
Why does a public servant need a private server? Why?
If the person was being upstanding, working within the rule of law, upholding the oath that was sworn, all of their email traffic would have been on the classified State server, since everything this position does is CLASSIFIED, right?
“Did she contact family members who were members of muslim brotherhood?”
I don’t know... ask Guccifer, he might know...
“Would an IT specialist be able to use her account as a window to all of the other (including HRCs) on the server ?”
Not unless her account had administrator privileges on the server, which is extremely unlikely.
Hmm, now that you mention it, that does look like a penis, but it’s part of some bigger doodle and the rest is pretty unidentifiable to me, so I’m not sure if it was meant to be a penis or if it’s just coincidence...
No, not from his time in office, it is the server he set up after he left office, to handle the Clinton Foundation business.
Oh... a 1999 vintage server.....I feel much better now......
If you are saying this is the lying crap the Obama administration will spew as an excuse for corrupt non-enforcement, ok — you are probably right. Otherwise, please cite the legal basis for your assertion that proof of intent is required in this type of case.
The law is specifically written so that proving intent is not required.
Suppose Boris Rodhamovich Badanov is arrested sneaking out of the Pentagon, with a memory chip containing all US nuclear plans, with the Top Secret/NOFORN labels removed. Boris says he has no documents marked classified, thought they were pretty, and in his mind intended to use them solely in a peaceful art project.
Would the government have to prove intent to commit espionage?
Looking through these doodles, I have an observation. These were made by a left-hander. I’m left-handed, and this is how I would have drawn them. Look at them and think left-right-handed. If you are a right-hander, do you think the images would have been reversed?
You are a rare commodity here at FR. Someone who "gets it."
The "intent" nonsense is already being spread....has been for a few weeks now.
The case of negligence is SO CRYSTAL CLEAR HERE that if this were medical, the victim would be cashing a check with at least 7 figures.
There is no way this is not negligence. She needs to receive a sentence of 1-10 years prison or there is no justice. No doctor could survive that claim with the same amount of negligence.
“...is pretty unidentifiable to me.”
Following comment on obama. Could be expression of Bill’s opinion of obama.
A penis and a “bone” next to Dole....
No, that memo was from Clinton’s tenure, so “the President” is referring to BJ himself, not Obama. I was thinking the doodle may represent Dole...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.