Skip to comments.
Trump Won't Give Specifics on Abortion; "I'm Pro-Life But I don't Want To Talk About It Right Now
Life News ^
| 1/27/2016
| Steven Erntelt
Posted on 01/27/2016 10:25:06 AM PST by conservativejoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: conservativejoy
How do you ‘prove’ you’re pro-life? It’s an opinion.
You can make all the promises in the world campaigning for the presidency.
21
posted on
01/27/2016 10:46:00 AM PST
by
Read Write Repeat
(Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
To: DannyTN
Many Trump supporters are also single issue: “build the wall”.
That means they are ignoring large swaths of Trump’s character and track record. That is risky as well.
We must look at the whole package on all of the candidates, which means you cannot shout down all discussion with “he promised to build the wall!!!”
To: SoConPubbie
Perhaps you should look into Reagan’s past positions and record on abortion when he was governor of CA before you cast stones.
23
posted on
01/27/2016 10:50:28 AM PST
by
bjcoop
To: Read Write Repeat
How do you âproveâ youâre pro-life? Itâs an opinion.
You can make all the promises in the world campaigning for the presidency.
You do it by staking out conservative Pro-Life policy positions and then backing it by action, both of which Cruz has done, and both of which TRUMP (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME) has not.
24
posted on
01/27/2016 10:51:01 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: DannyTN
To address abortion, we need to change Congress. Congress didn't mandate that abortions be legal, SCOTUS did. Remind me again who appoints SCOTUS justices.
25
posted on
01/27/2016 10:51:10 AM PST
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: bjcoop
Perhaps you should look into Reaganâs past positions and record on abortion when he was governor of CA before you cast stones.
I'm talking about the positions that both men ran on/are running on.
Don't try muddying the water by trying to bring in positions/actions that happened much more than a decade before Reagan ran and won the Presidency.
Reagan was unabashedly Pro-Life, TRUMP (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME!) is unabashedly Pro-Abortion as proven by his own words:
JANUARY 2015
First he states he is in support of Abortion for Rape, Incest and Health of the Mother.
Then Trump was asked about a abortion by a woman being pregnant, and not from rape or incest, and Trump answered that it depends on how far along the baby is.
"It depends when"
INTERVIEWER: "So say a woman is pregnant, and it is not in any of those exceptions [rape/incest]categories, and she chooses to have an abortion"
TRUMP: "it depends when, it depends when"
YouTube Video of Interview
26
posted on
01/27/2016 10:53:36 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Read Write Repeat
How do you âproveâ youâre pro-life? Itâs an opinion. Actions and consistency. It works with every other issue.
27
posted on
01/27/2016 10:54:44 AM PST
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: SoConPubbie
That was from over a year ago
28
posted on
01/27/2016 11:00:09 AM PST
by
bjcoop
To: DannyTN
Oh, I’ve heard him just fine. I’ve heard him promise something to every special interest group he appears in front of. I’ve heard him promise single payer healthcare where government “pays for everything”. I heard him say he’s going to get Mexico to pay for his wall...not going to happen without the force of troops and another war.
29
posted on
01/27/2016 11:05:32 AM PST
by
RasterMaster
("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: bjcoop
That was from over a year ago
Just like many of TRUMP's (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME) policy positions that seem to change with the political winds, right?
That being said, if you were listening, that was TRUMP'S (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME) PRO-LIFE DECLARATION.
There has been no clarification on the specific policy positions he outlined in that statement to this date.
So what is your point?
30
posted on
01/27/2016 11:07:35 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: conservativejoy
See this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcUCLwWCihE
31
posted on
01/27/2016 11:07:48 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
To: bjcoop
32
posted on
01/27/2016 11:08:29 AM PST
by
RasterMaster
("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: SoConPubbie
Except you have zero proof Cruz or Trump are pro-life except they both say they are.
I’m not being obtuse here. Policy isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on, nor are words. It makes you feel good, and it’s not earth shattering for someone with an R next to their name, along with lower taxes and pro-Israel.
Maybe I’m getting increasingly jaded with every “debate.”
33
posted on
01/27/2016 11:09:28 AM PST
by
Read Write Repeat
(Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
To: Read Write Repeat
Maybe Iâm getting increasingly jaded with every âdebate.â
Or maybe you just don't want the fact that TRUMP (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME) is Pro-Abortion to be part of the debate?
34
posted on
01/27/2016 11:10:54 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
You’re barking up the wrong tree and trying to make this personal.
I know what pro-life is because I’m pro-life — and it’s my opinion. I want pro-life judges. I don’t want Planned Parenthood to get federal funds.
Tell me how I prove that without being a mayor or a governor signing on legislation.
35
posted on
01/27/2016 11:14:28 AM PST
by
Read Write Repeat
(Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
To: Read Write Repeat
He could come out for defunding PP
36
posted on
01/27/2016 11:18:47 AM PST
by
Leto
To: Leto
Didn’t he do that?
Again, it’s words. Congress holds the purse strings when they aren’t allocating that power to Obama.
37
posted on
01/27/2016 11:30:34 AM PST
by
Read Write Repeat
(Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
To: bjcoop
Exactly. That wasn’t the topic at hand.
And Trump should be short with reporters who can’t do their homework. He has been plain on his position. He’s written at least two very clear statements recently that details his position exactly.
LifeNews is starting to bug me with this crap.
38
posted on
01/27/2016 11:32:51 AM PST
by
Marie
(TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
To: Read Write Repeat
Youâre barking up the wrong tree and trying to make this personal.
No to both.
Just trying to figure out why you think that TRUMP'S (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME!) stated positions shouldn't be part of the decisioning matrix used to select a candidate to vote for?
JANUARY 2015
First he states he is in support of Abortion for Rape, Incest and Health of the Mother.
Then Trump was asked about a abortion by a woman being pregnant, and not from rape or incest, and Trump answered that it depends on how far along the baby is.
"It depends when"
INTERVIEWER: "So say a woman is pregnant, and it is not in any of those exceptions [rape/incest]categories, and she chooses to have an abortion"
TRUMP: "it depends when, it depends when"
YouTube Video of Interview
39
posted on
01/27/2016 11:33:24 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: conservativejoy
I’m surprised Trump didn’t give the correct answer: “Specifics” are up to the states.
Personalyy, I think any state that legalizes murder should be expelled from the Union. This is what should have happened to California and New York before Roe and Doe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson