Skip to comments.
Gravitational wave rumors ripple through science world
spacedaily.com ^
| 01/12/2016
Posted on 01/12/2016 9:00:15 PM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 last
To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
81
posted on
01/13/2016 4:04:00 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: BenLurkin
82
posted on
01/13/2016 5:03:05 PM PST
by
sauropod
(I am His and He is mine.)
To: captmar-vell
Are gravitational waves and wormholes connected?
83
posted on
01/13/2016 6:23:33 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(Trump's living rent-free in Jeb's head - Trump's wearing a robe and comfy slippers. FlickLives)
To: GOPJ
in theory’s involving quantum entanglement within a wormhole manipulated with unlimited gravitational energies, sure why not, that may help explain infinite speed,
of course I have no idea what I’m talking about :-)
To: captmar-vell
If space-time folds over on itself how would ‘speed’ be defined between any two points?
85
posted on
01/14/2016 10:35:56 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Trump's living rent-free in Jeb's head - Trump's wearing a robe and comfy slippers. FlickLives)
To: GOPJ
Lots of smart folks here, I’m probably the last person on FR to ask :-)
I believe gravity may be the most powerful force in the universe vs. having an appearance of being a dispersed weak one,
However I was merely conjecturing as a thought experiment (not sure its even valid) but could two particles be entangled on opposite ends of a gravitational wave or ripple (or wormhole) and if so what does that mean for the speed of light? Its feels to me like the elephant in the room,
To: captmar-vell
We'll assume gravity's a strong force rather than a weak force... and assume space-time folds over on itself - possibly an infinite number of times... That would explain why we don't ‘fall through’ - - the countervailing force on the other side would be... hold for it - gravity. The wormhole would not be off in space - it would be beneath our feet... so to speak. Anyhow I don't understand any of this... just having fun.
87
posted on
01/18/2016 11:41:14 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Dem debate hosted by Google, NBC & non-convicted members of Congressional Black Caucus-Greenfield)
To: GOPJ
I’ve wondered why no one has suggested the possibility of a gravitational anomaly (natural wormhole) to explain KIC 8462852?
Einstein predicted them, so what would their appearance be, what would they look like if we actually spotted one far off in some other part of the galaxy?
As to the possibility of an infinite number of folds I don’t think so, to my way of thinking that is used to explain things which may be inconvenient,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson