Posted on 12/03/2015 1:35:36 PM PST by sparklite2
ummm, no
His findings are politically incorrect. What about the emotional status of homos?
I don’t believe most homos ever cared about getting married. They just want e to stick their perversions in people’s faces. The ones that thought a piece of paper from our courts would make them happy have likely found that they’re still miserable.
Who cares? I’m not looking for an emotional boost, I’m looking to obey God. That’s the most important thing.
Why would any man ever w]live with a woman they are not required to do so by law?
Marry her and you have a very good chance she'll get at least 1/2 your stuff in the divorce.
50 years of liberals writing family law has consequences.
I disagree completely; shacking up and actually being married are two VERY different things and can’t show the same results at all.
Oh yes, there is that Breaking Up thing
that's such a bummer
Pull out this article when your long-time girlfriend starts dropping increasingly aggressive, two-ton hints about wanting The Ring.
It’s a lie. Fornication is a sin. The wages of sin is death.
What portion of matrimonial assets is the wife entitled to? One tenth? One third? Half? None?
They’re talking, I think, about the relaxation of the emotional distress of being single. Evidently, for guys, shacking up still feeds single. What’s changed over the years is that women, this drop in stress used to require marriage, but now shacking up does it just as well.
Yes, dear.
Sure, now that the institution of marriage has been redefined repeatedly from a religious bond “’til death do you part” to a legal contract for workplace benefits, there is no “emotional boost”.
Got it! BTW, were the offspring of the live-ins asked whether they would receive an “emotional boost” from a more stable arrangement?
Human sciences are probably the most worthless studies a college student can pursue. Oops, forgot Women Studies, Black Studies, LBGT Studies, Human Potty Training Studies, et al. None amount to a real job except in government or other corporate lazy jobs, not to mention it is not an empirical science. Anybody can write a thesis on the human condition because there is no definitive character of homos. People's thinking, feelings, attitudes, behavior vary from one to the next according to their environment.
Let's see:
In the 70's, these "human scientists" said there was no difference between boys and girls. The term was, "Nurture vs Nature" and it was "settled science" that differences didn't exist. Then, in the 80's they found there was an inherent difference the sexes. Not only how the toddler boys and girls would address a problem, but SURPRISE! in brain chemistry. Geeze, any parent could tell the difference immediately between testosterone driven boys and estrogen driven girls. Well, maybe not the trans-genders. Ha.
Looking for a low-paying unappreciated job in Human Resources? by all means pursue a doctorate in "human sciences". Even Sheldon of "The Big Bang Theory" would consider them non-scientists.
I imagine the children were a little too young to have emotional stress from being single.
An emotion-based study is worth nothing more than the mercurial nature of an emotional reaction.
Honest theremis no upside to men getting married anymore. Its an invitation to lose control of your life and half your stuff at another persons whim.
... and that’s why I live alone. LOL
She may be correct now that marriage means nothing. Thanks USSC.
Asked my wife the other day why we should stay married with her being a supporter of gay marriage - she had no answer and changed the subject. I internally couldn't answer either. What's the point now? Legal benefits/considerations? Of course, she is my partner and love for my life. But why did the gays have to usurp that traditional term? Why couldn't they have originated their own term for a legal partnership?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.