Posted on 12/01/2015 4:26:06 PM PST by rickmichaels
How does he know it was en route to the moon? All he knows is that he picked up the CSM S-band signal, which could have been in Earth orbit. Or a relay. Besides, you have one data point - one - maybe. If your one data point is so important, then why are data points that are contrary to the standard story irrelevent? Answer - they're not. But people who discuss them don't start invoking 911.
You are full of it. I KNOW people who have used those retroreflectors. What a sick society this is.
You might know people who bounced lasers off of the moon, bu how did they get the beam width under a quarter-mile wide once it got there, and then pick out a return solely from the reflector and not the surface itself? This is physics, not a sick society. A sick society os one where asking science questions gets someone mob-attacked.
I have given up on this guy. After several requests, he finally responded to my points by stipulating not one, but several interlocking conspiracies, all of which had to be operating then and operating today. You see, to a person like this the absence of evidence is evidence of conspiracy.
In my posts to Talisker, I do regret using the word “idiot” so many times. Although descriptive, I should have chosen a more diplomatic word.
So the CSM’s S-band signal came from low Earth orbit according to Talisker. This element of conspiracy is so easy to shoot down due to orbital dynamics, but Mr. T will never figure it out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.