Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the Civil War about Slavery?
Acton Institute, Prager University ^ | 8/11/2015 | Joe Carter

Posted on 08/11/2015 1:11:21 PM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,081-1,098 next last
To: DiogenesLamp; PeaRidge
Originally posted by PeaRidge.

April 6, 1861

Lt. Porter took the Powhatan and sailed.

Seward sent a telegram to Porter: "Give the Powhatan up to Captain Mercer."

A dispatch boat caught up with Powhatan and delivered Seward's message.

Lt. Porter responded to Seward: "I received my orders from the President, and shall proceed and execute them.

Before leaving, Lt. Porter instructed the Navy Yard officials, "Detain all letters for five days."

Storms and boiler problems delayed Powhatan, but she arrived disguised and flying English colors.

Porter filed this report:

I had disguised the ship, so that she deceived those who had known her, and was standing in (unnoticed), when the Wyandotte commenced making signals, which I did not answer, but stood on.

The steamer then put herself in my way and Captain Meigs, who was aboard, hailed me and I stopped.

In twenty minutes more I should have been inside (Pensacola harbor) or sunk.

Signed: D.D. Porter

161 posted on 08/12/2015 1:01:58 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

So then, we agree that the motivation of Lincoln was to preserve the Union. From the beginning, through the middle and right up to the end of the Civil War.


162 posted on 08/12/2015 1:03:54 PM PDT by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Very little of the cotton crop was sold directly to European customers, just as very little of any commodity product today is directly sold to the final consumer today.

If you are arguing that they were getting gouged on both ends of the exchange, I would think they would find that even more objectionable, don't you?

Those merchants then took on the expense and risk of shipping and warehousing that cotton and selling it on the global market. When they sold that cotton to foreign buyers, they got the foreign currency which they used to purchase foreign goods, while also paying the tariff on imports. That is why the lion's share of tariffs were collected in New York.

So you are arguing that the New Yorkers were making more money off of Cotton than were the Southern producers? Why would anyone object to that?

163 posted on 08/12/2015 1:05:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy
So then, we agree that the motivation of Lincoln was to preserve the Union. From the beginning, through the middle and right up to the end of the Civil War.

That is my understanding. Yes, we agree on that.

164 posted on 08/12/2015 1:07:29 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

How many locations would you like?


165 posted on 08/12/2015 1:08:18 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I'd say Occam's razor points towards Lincoln lying.

I'd say you see only what you want to see. You always have.

166 posted on 08/12/2015 1:23:32 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
If you are arguing that they were getting gouged on both ends of the exchange, I would think they would find that even more objectionable, don't you?

That presumes you were getting gouged to begin with.

So you are arguing that the New Yorkers were making more money off of Cotton than were the Southern producers? Why would anyone object to that?

Isn't that what business is? Buying something for one price, selling it for another, and profiting off the difference?

167 posted on 08/12/2015 1:25:31 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
HOLD AND RETAKE.........NOTHING AS INNOCENT AS RESUPPLY...IN LINCOLN'S OWN WORDS;

12/12/1860 In an unprecedented action, Mr. Lincoln sent a secret message to his future subordinate Commander of the Army, General Winfield Scott.

From the Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln , vol. 4

To Elihu B. Washburne

Confidential
Hon. E. B. Washburne Springfield, Ills., Dec. 21. 1860

My dear Sir:
Last night I received your letter giving an account of your interview with Gen. Scott, and for which I thank you. Please present my respects to the General, and tell him, confidentially, I shall be obliged to him to be as well prepared as he can to either hold, or retake, the forts, as the case may require, at, and after the inauguration.

Yours as ever
A. LINCOLN

Lincoln had begun to formulate a plan to seize Ft. Sumter and Ft. Barranas even before his inauguration, and was interfering with the current administration.

168 posted on 08/12/2015 1:31:53 PM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Not sure why anyone would discuss anything with a liberal Democrat liar who parades around Free republic like they are some kind of queen.

I always thought that was why most people didn't respond to you general.

169 posted on 08/12/2015 3:53:30 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: PeaRidge

Not to seize it but to retake it from hostile insurrectionists. Ft Sumter was a federal installation.


170 posted on 08/12/2015 3:54:53 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Ok I ‘ll take your previous response as a non response. LOL.


171 posted on 08/12/2015 3:55:04 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: central_va

There’s that Gabby Johnson gibberish bit again. First time is funny. After that not so much.


172 posted on 08/12/2015 3:56:37 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

When you undertake a war that is lost to you even before you undertake it you can’t be thought of as a genius M’Lady.


173 posted on 08/12/2015 3:57:53 PM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

You mean my pal ‘’The General’’? (aka ‘’central va’’) Yeah. But I took no more notice than I would the noise of a gnat.


174 posted on 08/12/2015 4:00:34 PM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Pretty telling Lamp Boy that you couldn’t put an adult woman up there to make you pointless and rather salacious point. Not cool dude, not cool at all.


175 posted on 08/12/2015 4:03:23 PM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Boy, irony lost on you isn’t? Democrats created the Confederacy, Republicans defeated it and 150 years on you’re still venerating Dixiecrats on a conservative Republican website.


176 posted on 08/12/2015 4:05:02 PM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Pretty telling Lamp Boy that you couldn’t put an adult woman up there to make you pointless and rather salacious point. Not cool dude, not cool at all.

I thought a little girl was much more representative of his behavior, beside the fact that she was wearing stars and stripes, which I thought punctuated the point of "Childish Union Cheerleader".

177 posted on 08/12/2015 4:10:34 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: PeaRidge
Lincoln had begun to formulate a plan to seize Ft. Sumter and Ft. Barranas even before his inauguration, and was interfering with the current administration.

It seems apparent that he was planning to fight a long time before hostilities actually manifested.

People just don't want to believe that someone they were taught to admire was actually a deceitful manipulator.

178 posted on 08/12/2015 4:13:43 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
But I took no more notice than I would the noise of a gnat.

I would expect that you and a gnat would have a lot in common... brainpower for example.

179 posted on 08/12/2015 4:15:43 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

The South lost the war the moment it made up it’s mind to start it. For every one cannon foundry the South had, the North had ten. The South’s railway system was a hodgepodge of different gage tracks which meant freight trains had to be stopped and cumbersomely unloaded and reload back on to different trains, the North had a single gage railway system. The South had no navy to speak of. One of the first things the very powerful Union Navy did was blockade Southern ports. Lee should have realized after Vicksburg fell the game was over but as I said he led the slaughter for another two years. The idea of interjecting Nazis vs Poles is ridiculous. Poland’s Army put up a valiant defense at first but it was not the modern army Germanys was. It also didn’t help that three weeks after the Nazis invaded the Russians invaded. Polish resistance was a constant thorn in Germany’s side but Nazi Germany was eventually defeated by a coalition of Allied nations.


180 posted on 08/12/2015 4:18:03 PM PDT by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,081-1,098 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson