Posted on 08/11/2015 8:20:48 AM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy
LOL, yeah it would work there.
I can assure you that the “Ghostriders” saved my ass more than once.
Me too.
My fiancée, a former USAF Warthawg avionics fixer, tells me the A-10 outfits are already referring to the C130J as the *goatFokker....*
Well, something pretty close to that, anyway....
Thanks for that tidbit..and congrats on the upcoming nuptials. Bets of luck to you both. I hope your kids will recognize this country...
Not as bad as you might think. It's a variation of the XM204 *soft recoil* type gun mount. Of which there's also a 155mm version, though the projectiles are larger, and fewer could be carried aboard an aircraft. The 105 is likely the way to go, even if the larger gun could be so mounted.
Interestingly, there was a concept a couple of years back to mount a pair of XM204s on either side, aboard a CH47C *$hi!hook* [officially, Chinook helicopter. Don't know how well flight firing tests for that one worked out, but it's interesting to see that the Army has been thinking of alternate possibilities just in case the USAF decides to drop the A10 altogether.
I would not be a bit surprised if our kids, biological or adopted, are those who eventually sort out much of that unfamiliar to real American values, likely into something former Admiral Robert Anson Heinlein postulated around 1959, and which novel thereof remained on the USMC Commandant's recommended reading list for young new Marines until 2010 or so. It may still be on the Sgt Major of the USMC's list; see for yourself.
If memory serves, the 105mm howitzer they use is an M102 light towed, demounted from its usual home.
Pretty much. As when the USAAF took the 75mm main gun from the M24 light tank of WWII and mounted it in the B25 [H-model, IIRC] twin-engine bomber, the Air Corps/Force concocts its own designations for things, GAU-this and GAU-that. [Gun, Aircraft Unit. It pays to have someone in the household who speaks USAF]
The barrel and workings of an M119 might work as well.
Seems possible. The really big deal so far as aircraft use goes is working out a means of feeding ammo and a few added problems for fire control, like a 300-knot more or less forward airspeed to consider.
Some of the first AC47 and AC-119 simply stuck the guns out side windows and let fly, with a reflex gunsight from an A1 Skyraider sometimes mounted in the pilot and copilots' port and starboard windows; with three 7,62 General Electric M134 Gatling guns letting fly at circa 100 rounds per second each, that could be close enough for government work. When they reworked the AC119 *Dollar-Nineteen* into a gunship mounting a 20mm M61 Vulcan Gatling Cannon out the back ramp, and firing it as a *getaway gun* as they flew away from the bad guys after dropping flares and trying to look defensiveless, aimed fire took on new importance, lest they accidentaly hose the troops they were trying to support.
It was around this time that the term *friendly fire* took on a far more level of irony than previously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.