Skip to comments.
Gov. Scott Walker Taking Heat From Right and Left Over WEDC
The CapTimes
| 5/22/2015
| Mike Ivey
Posted on 06/01/2015 12:16:37 PM PDT by conservativejoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: conservativejoy
Gee, the Leader of the GOP pack gets attacked by the opposition using the DOJ.
So, what’s new and unexpected ? Nothing. same ‘ole same ‘ole.
2
posted on
06/01/2015 12:20:59 PM PDT
by
4Speed
To: conservativejoy
legislators are also going to remove the governor from the WEDC board, something Walker himself had proposed but will keep two Republican and two Democratic legislators on it. Walker had recommended removing all elected officials from the boardWant some fries with that nothingburger?
3
posted on
06/01/2015 12:30:36 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: conservativejoy
Sorry, a lot of the above did not show on my preview.
The content of the article is showing that there is real concern over the agency that Scott Walker created and taxpayer dollars that were paid to political donors by his agency that he Chairs.
So far, none of the money supposedly for job creation has actually resulted in new jobs. No one is being held accountable for that. Hence the investigation that will apparently now become Federal.
4
posted on
06/01/2015 12:32:15 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: ConservingFreedom
We might want to wait and see what the Federal investigation shows. If there was indeed “pay to play” involved, that is a game changer.
If it turns out that is the case, Walker removing himself after the fact will not exonerate him.
5
posted on
06/01/2015 12:35:25 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: conservativejoy
That's two articles in 15 minutes from you covering the same information - and there's no link for either of them. I know what smells fishier than the WEDC ...
6
posted on
06/01/2015 12:45:11 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
7
posted on
06/01/2015 12:50:05 PM PDT
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Ted-Cruz-2016 @ Engineering-Excellence.US)
To: ConservingFreedom
8
posted on
06/01/2015 12:50:50 PM PDT
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Ted-Cruz-2016 @ Engineering-Excellence.US)
To: Patton@Bastogne
Senator Bob Wirch (D-Somers)Quoting Dums now?
9
posted on
06/01/2015 12:56:44 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
don’t shoot me ... I’m just showing you what 100 million Americans will see on television by this Thursday night ...
10
posted on
06/01/2015 1:00:00 PM PDT
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Ted-Cruz-2016 @ Engineering-Excellence.US)
To: Patton@Bastogne
CMD's niche is investigating the undue influence of corporations, CEOs, and front groups on public policy, including exposing PR campaigns, lobbying, and electioneering. With the cuts to newsrooms and investigative journalism across the country, CMD's original and in-depth investigations are more important than ever in breaking through the corporate-backed PR that too often fills commercially-sponsored news outlets.
Why would a conservative look here for information?
11
posted on
06/01/2015 1:00:01 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
The source is there and the article was copied in total.
You might also want to check out the article from “Right Wisconsin”. It was posted on a later thread.
12
posted on
06/01/2015 1:00:57 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: Patton@Bastogne
The MSM hatchets that so delight you now will be swinging at Ted in due course.
13
posted on
06/01/2015 1:01:25 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
guess we’re all looking forward to Scott Walker’s response, ‘eh ?
14
posted on
06/01/2015 1:01:37 PM PDT
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Ted-Cruz-2016 @ Engineering-Excellence.US)
To: Patton@Bastogne
Good find! There is too much smoke in the form of Evidence already. Some will ignore it until indictments are handed down. Expect those to be forthcoming once the Feds get involved.
15
posted on
06/01/2015 1:05:33 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: ConservingFreedom
.
you still don't get it ...
all I and ConservativeJoy are doing is posting and commenting on a national news article ...
is any of this linked to Scott Walker's PECULIAR reluctance to announce his presidential candidacy ?
is any of this linked to Scott Walker's "defacto" endorsement of both Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio (when Walker announced he was declining-retreating from even running in Florida) ?
time will certainly tell ...
.
16
posted on
06/01/2015 1:06:34 PM PDT
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Ted-Cruz-2016 @ Engineering-Excellence.US)
To: conservativejoy
Its 2012 all over again. Divide and attack the conservative front runners leaving Jeb as thee only “electable” candidate. Of course, they do it by presenting the next conservative they will take down as the stalking horse. Cruz is better, abandon Walker, then when Criz is being taken down we will be told somenotherncandidate is better and on and on until only the GOPe selection is left.
To: conservativejoy
.
If the Scott Walker-WEDC case goes "Federal" ... Scott Walker's 2016 presidential run is "toast" ...
Note, that I'm not saying it's "fair" to Scott Walker ...
But for every "Horrible Hillary Scandal" news story that WASN'T published on ABC-CNN-NBC-NPR-CBS ...
the American public will see TEN stories on "Scott Walker's WEDC Corruption Scandal" ...
Again, it's not fair ... it's presidential politics ...
.
18
posted on
06/01/2015 1:11:08 PM PDT
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Ted-Cruz-2016 @ Engineering-Excellence.US)
To: Patton@Bastogne
What is fair is that if indeed there was “pay to play” involved here, as it looks like there was, we need to know this Now. I don’t expect anything but Corruption from Democrats. I don’t want this kind of mess associated with our next President. We don’t have to settle for this!
19
posted on
06/01/2015 1:16:10 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: FlipWilson
This is called “Vetting”. I’ve made it no secret that I support Cruz and do not trust Walker. That was before this began to surface. I want my vote to be based on Truth, not blind adoration of any candidate.
20
posted on
06/01/2015 1:19:01 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson