Posted on 03/25/2015 7:24:29 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
What daughter wants to shop for bras with their dad? Preposterous - same sex unions.
My dear nephew had a friend a few years ago - older than he - who seemed the pretty typical urban-culture hipster DJ that he hangs out with, because that is his “calling”.
This man already had a kid of 10, illegitimate, with problems of his own (boy, was he hyper). Taking care of him most of the time. They were actually living with my nephew’s family - because my dear sister RIP was always showing charity to everyone.
His background? Bad marriage ending in divorce of his parents, and mother who immediately went “lesbian” and picked out a “partner”. Partner shacked up with them even while he was in middle school. We’re talking late ‘90s here. Partner tried to act like another authority figure; resentment. Friend: “You’re NOT my FATHER!”
Geesh. His own “adult” life showed he didn’t get much out of all his formative years.
“I grew up surrounded by women who said they didn’t need or want a man. Yet, as a little girl, I so desperately wanted a daddy,” Heather wrote. “It is a strange and confusing thing to walk around with this deep-down unquenchable ache for a father, for a man, in a community that says that men are unnecessary...”
The really insulting thing about this is how this is forced on kids, while OTHER kids suffer the same basic thing because of something more natural.
My 1st-grade son’s class (total, 28) already has 3 - THREE - children whose mothers have died, one just before Christmas this year.
Why add to this tragedy by forcing your child to have no mom or dad because that’s what you like?
All I'm saying here is that the argument should not center around whether some homosexually-inclined people (or single mothers, or grandfathers, or orphanage care-givers) have good parenting skills. Some of them do.
The argument should center around whether kids need and have a right to their mothers and their fathers. They do. They have a right to be conceived and raised in the natural way, because it is predicated upon the needs of our human nature. Normalcy should be recognized as better, and should be the default choice. Yes, it should be legally privileged over non-normal arrangements.
I mentioned that Walker Percy and his two younger brothers were raised by their homosexual second cousin, William Alexander Percy (whom they called "Uncle Will") after both their father and mother had committed suicide. Obviously the birth-parents were unfit (as well as too soon dead) and Walker Percy lauds Uncle Will for giving them an excellent upbringing.
"Uncle Will" was a homosexual, but a closeted one. As far as I have been able to see from biographical materials, Uncle Will never practiced his proclivities except when he was on foreign vacation jaunts --- he craved "handsome Aegean youths" --- and (anonymously) publishing a book of Uranian poetry.
I'll grant that Uncle Will did very well by his three adopted nephews. But I would have a different judgment if he had had a same-sex "spouse" or steady partner or multiple revolving partners, or if he had disclosed his sexual conduct to them before they reached adulthood.
Open homosexual behavior is a very corrupting thing, especially when it acquires the undeserved highlighting of legal recognition and social approval.
Very well said.
Thank you.
YES!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.