Baraq might surrender to the towelheads.
But Israel won’t.
Yes his puppet master Valerie Jarrett would love that! But would she be surprised?......./sarc
Just how does anyone expect Iran to nuke anything when they don’t have the delivery vehicle to do it?
That's like comparing apples and pyramids. At the time it was nuked, Japan was facing disaster. Its navy had been sunk, its armies were in retreat on all fronts, B-29's were burning down its cities, and it faced a new war with the Soviet Union. The US may be in bad shape under Obama, but our situation is nothing like what Japan faced in the summer of 1945.
A) Japan had no nukes, and no air defences worth speaking of to shoot down additional nuke-armed B-29s (not that we had more bombs, but they didn’t know that at the time).
B) The US has thousands of nukes, plus the ability (even after all of Obama’s cuts to the military) to bomb Iran back to the Stone Age with conventional weapons.
C) If he tried that, I would bet that the military would revolt. There is NO PROVISION in the Constitution that allows a President to surrender to another nation.
Obama WANTS IRAN TO HAVE NUKES!
He believes it will aid in forcing Israel to make concessions Israel wouldn’t otherwise make.
Obama is stupid enough to believe he can keep Israel from protecting itself.
Is it really surrender when you are already on their side?
Well, to be objective, Japan was already defeated when we atomic bombed her. When Obama was elected, Sowell said that his presidency would be “catastrophic”. I think that Sowell sees something about Obama that truly horrifies him.
Well I don’t doubt Sowell is right about Barry but 90 million gun owners won’t surrender. In fact about an hour after the surrender Barry won’t be President anymore.
-PJ
Surrendering to any foreign power would be high treason. The military would undoubtedly send troops to Camp David or wherever he was hiding out, and with a little luck he’d end up “accidentally” dead. Or tried by a military court and shot.
Comrade obama is more likely to order a first strike on the United States himself in exchange for political asylum in Iran. That would save Iran a lot of money for the expense of warheads and delivery systems as well as the potential embarrassment of using nuclear devices that don’t work or are damaged in transit.
We can fantasize, though. Iran takes out two cities? Let's recall what happened to the fellows who took out two buildings and how long we persevered, and the rivers of blood we waded through, to find and punish those responsible. That's what would happen, and that part isn't a fantasy.
There would be, because there already is, a significant movement in the United States to demand surrender under the insistence that we deserved it. A movement that would last for the few weeks it would take to put the entire sorry lot up against the wall. The country might, actually, be the better for it. Those are dark fantasies and it would be better not to go there.