Posted on 12/08/2014 12:03:39 PM PST by naturalman1975
We had to carry so much crap in the Marines, late 80’s, early 90’s. Scarf. How many times am I going to wear a scarf on Parris Island, Camp LeJeune? It was part of our gear, so we always had to have it.
It’s interesting that a lot of people think medieval knights were slow due to their armor. In truth full plate armor weighs no more than a modern soldiers pack, and being spread over the entire body is not much of a hindrance to movement at all. Knights fought equally well on foot or horseback.
The Anglo-Saxon warrior at Hastings is perhaps not so very different from the British Tommy in the trenches, photographer Thom Atkinson says. At the Battle of Hastings, soldiers' choice of weaponary was extensive.
Re-enactment groups, collectors, historians and serving soldiers helped photographer Thom Atkinson assemble the components for each shot. It was hard to track down knowledgeable people with the correct equipment, he says. The pictures are really the product of their knowledge and experience.
Having worked on projects with the Wellcome Trust and the Natural History Museum, photographer Thom Atkinson has turned his focus to what he describes as the mythology surrounding Britains relationship with war.
Theres a spoon in every picture, Atkinson says. I think thats wonderful. The requirement of food, and the experience of eating, hasnt changed in 1,000 years. Its the same with warmth, water, protection, entertainment.
The similarities between the kits are as startling as the differences. Notepads become iPads, 18th-century bowls mirror modern mess tins; games such as chess or cards appear regularly.
Each kit represents the personal equipment carried by a notional common British soldier at a landmark battle over the past millennium. It is a sequence punctuated by Bosworth, Naseby, Waterloo, the Somme, Arnhem and the Falklands bookended by the Battle of Hastings and Helmand Province.
Atkinson says the project, which took him nine months, was an education. Ive never been a soldier. Its difficult to look in on a subject like this and completely understand it. I wanted it to be about people. Watching everything unfold, I begin to feel that we really are the same creatures with the same fundamental needs.
Kit issued to soldiers fighting in the Battle of Waterloo included a pewter tankard and a draughts set.
Each picture depicts the bandages, bayonets and bullets of survival, and the hooks on which humanity hangs: letter paper, prayer books and Bibles.
While the First World War was the first modern war, as the Somme kit illustrates, it was also primitive. Along with his gas mask a private would be issued with a spiked trench club almost identical to medieval weapons.
Each photograph shows a soldiers world condensed into a pared-down manifest of defences, provisions and distractions. There is the formal (as issued by the quartermaster and armourer) and the personal (timepieces, crucifixes, combs and shaving brushes).
From the cumbersome armour worn by a Yorkist man-at-arms in 1485 to the packs yomped into Port Stanley on the backs of Royal Marines five centuries later, the literal burden of a soldiers endeavour is on view.
The evolution of technology that emerges from the series is a process that has accelerated over the past century. The pocket watch of 1916 is today a waterproof digital wristwatch; the bolt-action Lee-Enfield rifle has been replaced by laser-sighted light assault carbines; and lightweight camouflage Kevlar vests take the place of khaki woollen Pattern service tunics.
We, Army, stuffed them in Claymore bags. How much you humped seem to depend on were you where and the type of Unit you were assigned to.
Thanks for those photos. Interesting that as soon as the firearm shows up - the armor is gone. And it took a long time for the technology for bullet-proof armor to come about.
You’re humpin’ too much stuff troop. You don’t need half this shit. ... Sergeant Elias.
Thanks for posting the pics.
I have made and worn chain mail and plate. You are correct, is is not as bad as many think it is. The SCA (society for creative anachronism) conducts fights in all forms of armor recreated from history.
bump
thank you
Ah, I was young and fit - so it didn’t seem all that heavy at the time. Being with the grunts, you were handed additional loads to carry besides your own stuff - mortar rounds, machinegun ammo, etc.
My weapon was an M-14 and all the extra ammo was to feed it when everybody else had the M-16. I was never tempted to have the M-16 when I saw how bad those things worked. My scam was to tell my company commander that we “didn’t have the M-16 in artillery yet” - and when I went back to my battery for my mail “the grunts want me to keep my ‘14”.
Had an army buddy tell me that “theM-14 was too heavy for Vietnam”. I told him that I wished he’d said something while he was there - “I’d have sent a big Marine to hold the rifle up for him”.
It was a while until he spoke to me again!
Loading magazines in the middle of a firefight is close to suicidal. Much better to have too many loaded magazines than too few.
Active Duty ping.
Fascinating. Thanks.
bimp
the years of being married to brown bess.
Thanks a fool in paradise .
Have to laugh. Looking at the 1815 private soldier Waterloo kit, and seeing the checkers set, apparently “Hurry Up and Wait” has been the lot of soldiers for quite some time.
Re-enactment groups, collectors, historians and serving soldiers helped photographer Thom Atkinson assemble the components for each shot. It was hard to track down knowledgeable people with the correct equipment, he says. The pictures are really the product of their knowledge and experience.
Visit the source site for an amazing look at these historical regalia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.